Laserfiche WebLink
EDC Minutes <br />September 18, 2009 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br />8. REPORTS OF STAFF <br /> <br />A. Former Let’s Get Graphic Building (2442 County Road 10) Available <br />Ms. Steinmetz said that the owner of Let’s Get Graphic tried to purchase the building but <br />the negotiations with the building owner fell through. Now that Let’s Get Graphic has <br />moved to Coon Rapids, there is about 14,000 square feet available at their former location <br />of 2442 County Road 10. Ms. Steinmetz said that more information about the building is <br />on the City’s Website in addition to all of the available business sites in Mounds View. <br /> <br />B. Recap of City Council Mini-Retreat on August 31, 2009 <br />Mr. Roberts stated that the City Council and Staff Department Heads met on Monday, <br />August 31, 2009 for their semi-annual retreat. He highlighted the discussion topics that <br />were most relevant to the EDC, which were “Review and reaffirm the 2009 City goals and <br />priorities” and “County Road 10 redevelopment and revitalization - aggressively pursue <br />redevelopment opportunities.” He said that the Council provided direction to City staff at <br />the retreat that they (the Council) are not interested in offering any new TIF for <br />redevelopment projects but that the Council is still interested in renaming County Road 10. <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Roberts mentioned a few other topics discussed by the Council at the retreat including <br />foreclosure response efforts, code enforcement, the 2010 City budget and the new location <br />for the City’s annual Town Hall Meeting. He expanded on the City’s code enforcement <br />efforts, stating that the amount of code enforcement cases that the City’s Code <br />Enforcement officer has opened this year is three times more than last year at this time and <br />the compliance rate is 80%. He credited the increase in cases to the new Code <br />Enforcement software that the City purchased. He added that City staff could not monitor <br />as many cases without the new software, not to mention that the City’s Code Enforcement <br />officer has other duties besides Code Enforcement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson asked if renaming County Road 10 would be a financial burden on <br />the City. Mr. Roberts said that it could be but that City staff has not delved into the process <br />yet. He added that Mounds View would also need the participation from adjacent cities. <br />Commissioner Larson stated that it is important for the City to move forward now with <br />renaming County Road 10 and that the City has been talking about doing so for years and <br />years. <br /> <br />Chair Meehlhause asked if the Council’s opposition towards the redevelopment of County <br />Road 10 is unanimous. Mr. Roberts and Ms. Steinmetz agreed that the consensus of the <br />Council is not to assist financially towards the redevelopment of County Road 10. <br /> <br />Commissioners Johnson and Newsmonger said that they do not understand this <br />reasoning. Commissioner Newsmonger added that County Road 10 is the first thing that <br />people see when driving through Mounds View and that potential businesses do not see <br />the internal improvements of the City, such as trails and new residential roads. <br /> <br />Commissioner Helgemoe said that Western Bank’s clients have difficulty locating the bank <br />because of the confusion between State Highway 10 and County Road 10. He added that <br />he could not imagine other Mounds View businesses do not have the same problem. <br />