My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2017/08/28 (3)
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
Agenda Packets - 2017/08/28 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:45 PM
Creation date
2/27/2018 2:20:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/28/2017
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/28/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 14, 2017 <br />Regular Meeting Page S <br />i Planner Sevald provided the Council with a brief history on the MWF Properties request for the <br />2 Boulevard apartment complex at the corner of Mounds View Boulevard and Groveland Road. <br />3 He noted Erin Laberee from Ramsey County was present to discuss a traffic study that was <br />4 completed for this project. <br />5 <br />6 Erin Laberee, Ramsey County Traffic Engineer, explained she reviewed the proposed Boulevard <br />7 apartment complex being proposed for the corner of Mounds View Boulevard and Groveland <br />8 Road. She discussed the County's position on this proposal and reported the development was to <br />9 have access off of Groveland Road per the County's access management policy. <br />10 <br />11 Council Member Meelilhause asked what it would take to have a traffic signal installed at this <br />12 intersection. Ms. Laberee reported traffic signals are installed at intersections where eight traffic <br />13 warrants have been met based on traffic volumes, etc. She explained spacing was an issue here <br />14 given the fact this intersection was only 1,000 feet from Red Oak and would create problems <br />15 with traffic flow. She noted she reviewed the crash history at this intersection. She commented <br />16 that the County could complete a warrant study. <br />17 <br />18 Council Member Meehlhause supported the County going through the warrant analysis process. <br />19 <br />20 Council Member Bergeron questioned if a business were to locate on these properties would the <br />21 City tell the potential developer that they could not have access to Mounds View Boulevard, Ms. <br />22 Laberee stated this was the case. <br />23 <br />24 Council Member Bergeron commented that concerns have been raised about safety and <br />25 neighborhood disruption that could easily be resolved if the County would allow access from the <br />26 proposed development to Mounds View Boulevard. He feared the County was more intent on <br />27 following their access policy than listening to their constituents. <br />28 <br />29 Mayor Mueller stated Groveland Road, which was a residential street, currently had 1800 trips <br />30 per day. She reported an additional 399 trips per day would be added to this residential roadway <br />31 because the County had denied access to Mounds View Boulevard. She explained she could not <br />32 understand why the County would not approve one access point onto Mounds View Boulevard <br />33 when currently the four properties each had their own access point. Ms. Laberee commented on <br />34 the County's access policy and stated if access could come off of a minor street, this should be <br />35 done, unless there was a compelling reason. <br />36 <br />37 Mayor Mueller questioned if there was any room for discussion on this matter, or if the County <br />38 would speak with the developer. Ms. Laberee stated the County had an access management <br />39 policy and noted the County has been working with the developer on access issues for the past <br />40 six months. She reported the County tried to limit access onto County roads for safety purposes. <br />41 She explained Ramsey County had the highest crash rate in the entire State of Minnesota due to <br />42 poor access management. <br />43 <br />44 Council Member Gunn explained the property in question already had a driveway onto Mum& <br />45 View Boulevard. She was puzzled why this driveway could not be continued to be used. She <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.