My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2013/10/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
Agenda Packets - 2013/10/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:46 PM
Creation date
2/27/2018 2:25:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/28/2013
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/28/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Desaree Crane <br />From: Mansky, Joseph <Joseph.Mansky@CO.RAMS EY.MN.US> <br />Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 20133:24 PM <br />To: Desaree Crane <br />Subject: FW: draftjoint powers agreement for city review <br />Des - see my responses below. <br />-----Original Message ----- <br />From: Jim Ericson[malito:JimE@ci.mounds-view.mn.usj <br />Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 12:33 PM <br />To: Mansky, Joseph <br />Cc: Desaree Crane; Mark Beer <br />Subject: RE: draft joint powers agreement for city review <br />Hi Joe, <br />Desaree and I have reviewed the draft JPA as have our attorneys with Kennedy & Graven, and the following represents <br />our collective comments, concerns and questions. <br />1. What is the present fund balance for the KAVA grant and do the estimates shown in Appendix D take these dollars <br />into account? <br />A: We currently have about $525,000 in HAVA funds, the bulk of which will be used to purchase the county -owned <br />equipment. As such, the impact of the HAVA funds is not currently shown in the estimated city costs in Appendix C. <br />2. Will the cities be required to pay maintenance costs immediately or only in the years following the execution of the <br />JPA? <br />A: We are not certain about this yet - it will depend in part on the extent and effect of the warranty that we get from <br />the vendor. It's possible that the first year maintenance costs will be lower because of the warranty. <br />3. How certain are you regarding the indicated cost estimates? Could they decrease depending upon proposals <br />received? Increase? For budgeting purposes, it would be good to have as firm an estimate as possible so that a budget <br />amendment is not required in 2014. <br />A: Good question. The current cost estimates are based on the proposals submitted to Hennepin County for their <br />voting system purchase in March. My thinking is that the proposals made by the same three vendors will likely be <br />similar. <br />4. Given that we already have a separate agreement with the County to provide election services, it would seem likely <br />that the various costs of training and implementation might be less for us --will there be any credit provided to such <br />municipalities? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.