Resolution 8921 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 8921 The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-6, as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: 1. Finding that Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-6 is a housing district as defined in MS, Section 469.174, Subd. 11. TIF District No. 1-6 consists of 4 parcels. The development will consist of 60 units of affordable workforce rental housing. All or a portion of which will receive tax increment assistance and will meet income restrictions described in MS. 469.1761. At least 40 percent of the units/homes receiving assistance will have incomes at or below 60 percent of statewide median income. Appendix E of the TIF Plan contains background for the above finding. 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future. The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable futtire: This finding is supported by the fact that the development proposed in this plan is a housing district that meets the City's objectives for development and redevelopment. The cost of land acquisition, site and public improvements and construction makes this housing development infeasible without City assistance. The cost of land acquisition and construction are approximately the same for workforce housing developments as they are for market rate projects. However, with decreased rental income from the affordable workforce housing units, there is insufficient cash flow to provide a sufficient rate of return, pay operating expenses, and service the debt. This leaves a gap in the funding for the project and makes this housing development feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer evidenced this need by providing a letter and a detailed pro forma as justification that the project would not have gone forward without tax increment assistance. The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan: This finding isjustified on the grounds that the costs of acquisition, building demolition, site improvements, utility improvements and construction of affordable housing add to the total redevelopment cost. Historically, the costs of site and public improvements as well as reduced rents required for workforce housing in the City have made development infeasible without tax increment assistance. The City reasonably determines that no other development of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development. 3. Finding that the TIF Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-6 conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan and found that the TIF Plan conforms to the general development plan of the City.