My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
2013 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2018 11:49:31 AM
Creation date
3/27/2018 11:14:16 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
532
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M i.� <br />'s i(Vi� <br />of Mounds View Staff <br />Item No: *A <br />Meeting Date: January 2 2013 <br />Type of Business: Other Planning Activity <br />To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br />From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate <br />Item Title/Subject: Discuss Proposed Code Amendment for Accessory <br />Buildings <br />Introduction: <br />Community Development staff is asked by residents what styles or types of "buildings" or <br />materials are allowed to be used as accessory buildings. The zoning code specifies a few <br />types of materials that are not allowed (such as tubular and canvas structures) and states <br />that the exterior must be weather resistant. <br />Discussion: <br />The Planning Commission has made changes to the zoning code regarding accessory <br />buildings, and there has been a lot of discussion over how much to regulate the styles of the <br />accessory buildings. Regulations for the roof pitch and style were added to the Code a few <br />years ago, but in general, the Planning Commission has decided not to regulate the styles of <br />accessory buildings that are allowed. The exception to this is when a conditional use permit <br />is approved for a structure over 952 square feet. One of the conditions is that the accessory <br />building shall have a uniform appearance with the house. <br />City staff has recently discovered a residential property in the City that is using a steel <br />shipping container as a shed. Staff does not feel that this type of structure is appropriate in <br />a residential district (or possibly in any zoning district), and is suggesting that the Planning <br />Commission consider adding language to the zoning code that would not allow these to be <br />used as storage buildings. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review and discuss the information, and <br />provide staff with direction about the proposed amendment. <br />Respectfully submitted. <br />CmmvL <br />Heidi Heller <br />Planning Associate <br />Attachments: <br />1. Photo of shipping container <br />2. Zoning Code sections that regulate accessory buildings <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.