Laserfiche WebLink
Ft. tt <br />-� �C VIEW <br />M®N--5 I. <br />l'ity of Mounds View ,Staff <br />Item No: 5A <br />Meeting ®ate: A riles 1� 2 <br />Type of Business: PublicHearin <br />Commission <br />To: Heidi Heller, Planning <br />Mounds View Planning <br />Associate Detached Accessory <br />From: Consideration of a Variance to allow 7 Woodlawn <br />a <br />Item TitletSubject: to Exceed the Maximum Height Limit at 802 <br />Building <br />Drive; Planning Case VRI 1-008 <br />uest in December 2011 and the City Council also <br />Intr®dam Commission denied this req the Council rescinded their denial and asked <br />The Planning Since then, nest again under different zoning <br />erarit for the garage has been i open" since it was <br />denied the variance in March 201 licant should use the <br />that the Planning Commission review this variance req <br />Council have decided that the applicant, Tim Downing, <br />requirements. City Staff and the ven that the (City lding p permit was issued. The app <br />issued in 2007,requesting a variance to allow the height of his <br />Zoning Code that was in effect when his . ht limit of 15 feet as measured at the <br />property owner of 8027 Woodlaxc Drive, is req Code in effect in 2007). Mr_ Downing has <br />detached accessory building to exceed the maximum heig midpoint. <br />midpoint between the eave and the peak (Zoning <br />built a second garage on his property that is 15 feet 9 inches tall at the <br />permit to construct a detached accessory <br />Disci applicant was issued a building p typical style, single story, 936 <br />The building plans submitted were for a t the Zoning Code height limit <br />►n October 2007, the app permit was issued, s garage <br />building on his property. At the time the <br />ara e. between the peak and the eave. Mr. Downing de. <br />square foot detached g 9 <br />point, which met the current zoning <br />was 15 feet as measured midway Building Official <br />plans showed.a height of 15 feet at the midway p time, and the City <br />arae for a long the permit "active until he <br />Mr. Downing did not start work is the garage <br />in order to kee permit will stay active as long <br />code, a building p The applicant may submit a <br />granted several extensions for his <br />rbuilding <br />he b glding g months. rant b their <br />had time to start construction. done at least every Official may g <br />as some construction work is being <br />ermit, which the Building <br />written request for an extension of their p ector on August <br />discretion. the City building insp <br />did not receive any <br />A footing inspection for the garage was finally done byhat, the Staff became aware <br />poured the next week. After gust 20111ty After <br />31, 2010, and the floor slab for more inspections. In late Aug licant's property. <br />requests from Mr. Downing beenara e Mr. Downing built was different. from <br />that a 2 -story garage with dorm staff saw that the gtrucgted on the <br />contact Mr. Downng in <br />reviewing the permit application, The Building Official o resp <br />again in September after receiving no response to the first letter. <br />the plans he had submitted in 2007. <br />late August 2011, and <br />