Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council February 26, 2018 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />entity acting to defend him or herself or to protect members of the general public from an <br />immediate life-threatening danger”. He believed such an Ordinance would not impact any <br />member of the community from owning a firearm, from possessing or carrying a firearm lawfully <br />in the City or to transport a firearm out of the City for practice purposes. He indicated this type <br />of Ordinance would place Mounds View on the leading edge of the country in an effort to curtail <br />deadly shootings of any kind. <br /> <br />Kenneth Glidden, 5240 Edgewood Drive, encouraged the Council to consider if the proposed <br />Ordinance amendment would make the residents of Mounds View safer. <br /> <br />Lisa Rolfs, 8429 Eastwood Road, stated she was not the only person in the room that found this <br />topic and the two separate hearings confusing. She believed most of the people in the room had <br />not heard about the gun range until two weeks ago, much less understood why the Council was <br />proceeding with an Ordinance amendment that would now allow the discharge of weapons in the <br />City. She indicated she felt like she was running trying to catch up to a speeding train without <br />fully understanding the topics on the table. She explained she was in favor of City Code aligning <br />with State Statute. However, she believed this was all that should be considered at this time. <br />She encouraged the Council to not rush through an amendment that would allow the discharge of <br />guns at a gun range at this time. She feared that the Council was simply acting on behalf of a <br />private party and not in the best interests of the Mounds View residents. <br /> <br />Joan Dauphinee, 7801 Gloria Circle, stated she has been trying to investigate all of the things that <br />are happening in the City. She questioned if Mounds View would be reviewing this Ordinance if <br />a developer had not proposed a gun club with apartments. She asked if the Heartland Gun Club <br />had assisted the City with the proposed amendment. She reported the NRA was pushing gun <br />shops and gun ranges into suburban areas and she feared people were becoming numb to guns. <br />She stated she was perplexed and confused as to why the City was pursuing this change. She <br />could not understand why Heartland Gun Club was coming to Mounds View, Minnesota for a <br />gun club when their only other location was in Florida. She encouraged the Council to consider <br />the back room deals that were being made surrounding guns. She stated she was scared and <br />nervous about this issue. She indicated she has done lock down drills with kids, talked with <br />these kids and understood these kids would change the climate of America right now. She <br />encouraged the Council to be transparent with their actions and believed this issue would not be <br />coming before the City if it weren’t for INH and the Heartland Gun Club. <br /> <br />Ann Zierdt, 7416 Parkview Drive, noted the definition of transparent as having thoughts, feelings <br />or motives that are easily perceived. She believed now was not the time to consider amending <br />the City’s gun Ordinance given the number of shootings that are occurring in the country. She <br />questioned why the developer, Pat Egan, had been consulting with the City on this matter if the <br />City was simply coming into compliance with State Statute. She believed there was no reason <br />for Pat Egan to be at City meetings. She feared his only interest in the City was gun club and not <br />any retail or apartments. She thanked the Council for their dedicated service to the community <br />but asked them to be transparent regarding this project. She commented on January 15th she left <br />messages with Penny Howard and Chris Lennox as she wanted to learn about their stance on the <br />proposed gun club. She stated she received a call back from Chris Lennox and was told by the