Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council February 26, 2018 <br />Regular Meeting Page 14 <br /> <br />B was removed. <br /> <br />Mayor Mueller discussed the developer’s agreement with INH which included a 124-unit market <br />rate four story apartment complex with a small amount of retail. She indicated their proposal <br />also included a 16,000 to 20,000 square feet of specialty retail. She reported the developer has <br />been very up front stating they had an investor (Heartland Gun Club) who would like to utilize <br />this portion of the development. She explained the market rate apartments would be owned and <br />managed by INH. She reported INH had no fear of renting these units with the full <br />understanding a gun club would be located on the same property. She stated the developer told <br />the City Council there were a couple of issues, one being access directly onto Mounds View <br />Boulevard. After many discussions with the County, the City was told the Crossroad Pointe <br />development would have access from Edgewood Boulevard. She feared how this would impact <br />traffic in the area. She reiterated the fact that the City Council does not have a final plan before <br />them. She commented on the discussions that were held regarding City managed garbage <br />collection and stated she understood, in the end, the public wanted to maintain the right to choose <br />their garbage provider. She discussed the proposed amendment on the floor and asked if the <br />public honestly believed the City Council was not looking out for the best interests of the public. <br />She commented without deliberate actions, a gun was no more lethal than a rock. She stated she <br />was not for or against the project but commented the proposed project would offer tax relief for <br />all residents in the community. However, if the exception was removed, she was confident the <br />INH developers would present a proposal that does not include a gun club and may require a City <br />subsidy. She explained she wished the Council could answer more the questions being raised by <br />the public but noted the City was still gathering information. She discussed the number of <br />Mounds View and New Brighton residents that had the right to conceal and carry. She <br />commented on the history of Simon’s which allowed for the sale of guns in Mounds View. She <br />questioned why the public was so afraid of allowing people to practice the safe use of a gun. She <br />understood some of the public may support a gun range if it was proposed for another location in <br />the City. She stated she appreciated the public’s patience as the Council worked through this <br />issue. She commented on the amendment on the floor and noted she would be voting against it <br />because she would like to table action on the Ordinance to allow staff and the City Council to <br />gather more information. She discussed how Mounds View would be adversely impacted when <br />TCAAP began to develop. <br /> <br />Council Member Bergeron commented the Council was still waiting to receive a market analysis <br />from INH that was talked about over six months ago. He added that INH indicated during their <br />first proposal that the market analysis was pending at that time and added that perhaps they were <br />having a difficult time finding another apartment complex/shooting range to compare it to. He <br />explained that the Council, when this proposal was first before them, expressed contentment for <br />the gun club with a 4-1 vote and to go ahead with the INH plans which is why he believes INH <br />has not pursued other specialty retail for the site. He commented that by voting for this <br />amendment, the City would be forcing INH to find more suitable specialty retail or they would <br />need move forward with only the market rate housing portion of the development. He added that <br />if TIF was offered, the City would still be getting a portion of the property taxes. He thanked the <br />residents that came out commented that the majority of the public was not against 2nd <br />Amendment rights, but rather were focused on safety and economics. He added that based on the