My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-26-1999 CC
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
07-26-1999 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2018 9:15:24 AM
Creation date
6/12/2018 10:19:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/26/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Allen & Joy Dick CUP Request <br />8059 Red Oak Drive <br />July 26, 1999 <br />Page 2 <br />12.5 percent of the rear yard area. The maximum coverage allowed is 20 percent. <br />Adverse Effects and CUP Criteria <br />The City Code, in Section 1125.01, Subd. 1 states that the Planning Commission shall examine <br />the possible adverse effects of a conditional use permit request prior to making a <br />recommendation. The following represent those items explicitly stated in the Code: <br />Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential <br />areas so as to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and <br />residential property in general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property, 8059 <br />Red Oak Drive, as low-density residential. This proposal does not conflict with the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />2. The Geographical Area Involved. <br />4. The Character of the Surrounding Area <br />In this area of Mounds View, most of the lots are larger than the subject property. The <br />homes are generally of a similar style architecture and were built around the same time, <br />although the subject home is newer and is larger than those in the immediate area. Many <br />of the homes in the immediate area have larger garages, most of which are detached as in <br />this proposal. A larger garage on the subject property would not appear out of place. <br />Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. <br />Adding to the existing garage will have an immediate positive impact on the value of the <br />subject property. At 1,000 square feet, set back from the street as far as it is, this garage <br />addition probably would not depreciate the surrounding area in any way. <br />5. The demonstrated need for such a use. <br />The existing garage --while a two stall garage-- is considered fairly small by today's standards. <br />With multi -car families being the norm rather than the exception, the need for more garage <br />space becomes an issue. This is the case with the applicants --both of whom have vehicles as <br />do their children, in addition to a boat. Clearly the need is evident. <br />This proposal appears to satisfy the adverse effects criteria. Also in Section 1125.0 1, the Planning <br />Commission is to examine the criteria for granting a conditional use permit, which are outlined in <br />Section 1125.01, Sub 3b: <br />(1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other <br />public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. <br />(7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.