My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/07/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/07/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:58 PM
Creation date
6/12/2018 10:29:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/12/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/12/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
UNAPPROVED <br />Mayor Coughlin asked if he would be open to assisting staff in arranging a forum by which staff, the <br />neighbors, and he could address the issues. Mr. Waites stated that he would, as in the past. He stated that <br />Council Member Stigney was aware that they had resolved previous issues with the neighbors, and that <br />all parties were reasonable. <br />Mayor Coughlin suggested they plan for staff to work with Mr. Waites and the surrounding neighbors to <br />resolve the issues. <br />Council Member Marty asked if, after their discussion, the matter could come before a future Work <br />Session, with the neighbors present. Mayor Coughlin stated that discussion of the matter may not rise to <br />the level of a Work Session, but certainly could be open to the public and any individual Council <br />Members who desired to address the issue. <br />Acting Administrator Ulrich stated that they should obtain the input of staff, and after their meeting with <br />the owner and neighbors, have staff report back to the Council. <br />Council Member Thomason agreed. She stated that she had a concern regarding the second stipulation, <br />in relation to the requirement that some type of buffer be placed, which would be economically feasible. <br />City Attorney Long stated that he would like the opportunity to research whether or not the matter was <br />previously imposed as a condition of the license. He stated that if the specific steps were outlined <br />through dialogue between the owner and staff, the inclusion of a condition could be added to indicate that <br />if the owner did not act in good faith, action could be taken against the license. He stated that, in <br />consideration of the license renewal deadline, this approach was possibly the best way to bring forward a <br />set of measures that would be workable. <br />Mayor Coughlin assured that the matter would come before the Council in its present membership, they <br />would have the opportunity to revisit the issues, and discuss the reports generated by staff at a later date. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomason/Marty. To Approve the Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for <br />Robert's Off 10, 2400 County Road H2, with stipulations. <br />Ayes — 4 Nays — 0 Motion carried. <br />L. Consideration of Resolution 5347 Approving the Ninth and Tenth Rider to the <br />Agreement with St. Paul Water Utility to Construct a Bituminous Path within the <br />Right -of -Way on County Road I <br />Mayor Coughlin stated that this item had been approved in regard to the Spring Lake Road re- <br />construction project noting, however, that it required a formal resolution in severalty. <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich stated that he had received the Ninth and Tenth Rider from the St. Paul <br />Water Utility, noting that he had not been provided with the first eight Riders to date. He stated that the <br />Ninth pertains to the Realife Cooperative's sidewalk, which would cross a small portion of the St. Paul <br />Water Utility easement. He stated that the sidewalk would be maintained by the City. <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich stated that the Tenth Rider was in regard to a bike/pedestrian path on <br />County Road I. He stated that there were two stipulations in regard to the path. One stipulation was that <br />23 CA\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\6-28-99.CC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.