Laserfiche WebLink
distinguishing features, water flow problems, engineering concerns, traffic patterns, and <br />accident prone areas. <br />Incentives: <br />Determining the residents' desires earlier in the process benefits the residents, <br />Council, and city staff. Documenting the questionnaire's results and the informational <br />meetings' responses in the feasibility study provides the citizens with a way to influence <br />decisions for a project that will affect them directly. Council is given a more concrete <br />vehicle to respond to the citizens' input regarding a particular project. Finally, actively <br />seeking the residents' desires will ultimately compliment the reconstruction process by <br />reflecting a project based on a mix of both city and residential goals. <br />Recommendation 4: <br />The city integrates a flexible 18- to 36- month time schedule for street reconstruction <br />projects. <br />Discussion: <br />Current city reconstruction practices use an eighteen -month time schedule for <br />reconstruction projects. Using a three-year timeline will provide ample time to propose, <br />adopt, and construct a road reconstruction project. During this time period citizens and <br />officials will work together to bring community support to the project. Proposals are <br />examined, concerns are addressed, and workable solutions are sought. If the project's <br />issues can not be resolved, it is dropped and revisited at an annual reprioritized visit. The <br />below three-year process outlines the goals of each phase. <br />Year 1: Initial contact with residents informing them that the city needs to <br />consider a street improvement for their street. City mails out a <br />questionnaire to the residents within the project area to determine <br />their concerns and interests; design type options are explored with <br />residents. Objective is to establish rapport with residents, <br />understand interests, create workable relationships to determine <br />project. <br />Year 2: Contact with residents reestablished with further project <br />development discussions, more purpose given to real project <br />design parameters in accordance with residents' interests, time <br />frame for construction, assessment, etc. established with residents. <br />If project is defined and determined to be acceptable, <br />recommendation will go to Council for implementation for <br />following year's budget and construction season. <br />Year 3: City commences with 429 -assessment process and project <br />construction. <br />(Quoted from minutes 12-3-98) <br />