Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council February 26, 2018 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />1 and should not be squandered on a gun shop and gun range. She commented on how property <br />2 values surrounding the gun range would decrease and noted how this would impact adjacent <br />3 homeowners. For this reason, she recommended the Council not pursue the gun shop/gun range <br />4 and suggested the City Council not bring a nationally divisive issue into this community. She <br />5 recommended the Council not abandon their previous vision for this property. She believed that <br />6 together the City could do better. <br />7 <br />8 Jerry Schwartz, 5079 Eastwood Road, stated he was a 1St and 2nd Amendment supporter. He <br />9 commented if residents gave up their 2nd Amendment right, the 1St Amendment right would <br />10 follow. He discussed a news article that was put out by Pat Kessler with WCCO stating 36% of <br />11 Minnesotan's own a gun. He reported in 2017, Ramsey County completed 683,544 background <br />12 checks and gave out 473 permits to buy. He stated there were 94,382 hand guns sold and <br />13 125,000 long guns. He commented Minnesota now had 283,188 individuals with a permit to <br />14 carry. He explained the proposed gun range would have self-defense classes and permit to carry <br />15 classes. He was of the opinion that the signs being waived tonight were similar to protesters that <br />16 did not know what they were doing. <br />17 <br />18 Laurel Halverson Bernard, 2504 Ridge Lane, stated she lived just a few blocks from the proposed <br />19 development and noted she had four children. She explained one of her children was in college, <br />20 one had a traumatic brain injury and two attended Edgewood Middle School. She stated she is <br />21 opposed to having a gun shop and gun range in her neighborhood. She indicated she was not <br />22 opposed to people owning guns or how to use a gun but did not want a gun range in her <br />23 neighborhood. She explained she grew up near a gun range, out in the country, which was a very <br />24 different situation. She feared how her neighborhood and her children would be impacted if a <br />25 gun range were located on the Crossroad Pointe property. She encouraged the Council to <br />26 remember why people live in Mounds View, because it was family friendly and had beautiful, <br />27 safe schools. She stated she wanted her kids and her neighbor's kids to remain safe. <br />28 <br />29 Russ Warren, 8044 Greenwood Drive, stated the Council was amending City Code in order to <br />30 facilitate a gun range with a developer. He believed the Council was acting on behalf of the <br />31 developer and not the citizens. He understood the developer was proposing a $40 million project <br />32 and noted the net impact on him would be $3 per month. He stated he did not want Mounds <br />33 View to be known simply as the City with The Mermaid or the gun club. He requested the <br />34 Council deny the Ordinance amendment or table it to another time. <br />35 <br />36 Scott Schrader, 2566 Hillview, stated he and his wife came to Mounds View by accident and <br />37 moved into the community because of its parks and friendliness. He explained the proposed <br />38 location for the gun club/gun range was all wrong due to its close proximity to a school. In <br />39 addition, he did not anticipate the retirees living at Bel Ray wanted to spend the rest of their days <br />40 adjacent to a gun range. He encouraged the Council to not turn the community into "that place" <br />41 where people did not want to live. He suggested another location be considered for the gun <br />42 range, perhaps in a business or industrial park. He recommended Crossroad Pointe be considered <br />43 for other development, such as apartments and retail, noting this was a prime location along the <br />44 Mounds View Boulevard corridor. <br />45 <br />