My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2016/02/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
Agenda Packets - 2016/02/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:32 PM
Creation date
6/13/2018 4:07:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/22/2016
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/22/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 23, 2015 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />He discussed the appeal request from Brentley Zaier at 2090 Oakwood Drive in detail with the 1 <br />Council. There was concern with the additional maintenance required with the infiltration basin. 2 <br />Staff requested the Council take comments from the public and uphold the recommendation of 3 <br />denial of the appeal. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Council Member Mueller questioned where the proposed infiltration basin was on Mr. Zaier’s 6 <br />property. Public Works Director Erickson described the location of the proposed infiltration 7 <br />basin noting it would have a one-foot grade over a four-foot distance. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Council Member Mueller asked if the City had any wiggle room with the number of infiltration 10 <br />basins that were needed for Area I. Public Works Director Erickson stated the number of 11 <br />infiltration basins was recommended by Bolton & Menk, but noted there was a little bit of wiggle 12 <br />room. He indicated the City could put the property at 2090 Oakwood Drive at the bottom of the 13 <br />priority list. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Mayor Flaherty discussed the reason the City had to install infiltration basins and the increased 16 <br />costs the City would have to incur if the infiltration basins were not installed. 17 <br /> 18 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Hull. Approving the Denial of Stormwater Infiltration 19 <br />Program Appeal #33 for the property at 2090 Oakwood Drive within Area I of the Street and 20 <br />Utility Improvement Program. 21 <br /> 22 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1 (Mueller opposed) Motion carried. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Public Works Director Erickson discussed the appeal request from 2193 Terrace Drive in detail 25 <br />with the Council. There was concern with the additional maintenance required with the 26 <br />infiltration basin. He reported the City would design around the existing landscaping on the 27 <br />property. Staff requested the Council take comments from the public and uphold the 28 <br />recommendation of denial of the appeal. 29 <br /> 30 <br />John Holan, 2193 Terrace Drive, explained he was not a big fan of infiltration basins. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Mayor Flaherty explained why the City had to install infiltration basins noting this was the most 33 <br />economic and least intrusive way for the City to manage stormwater. 34 <br /> 35 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Hull/Gunn. Approving the Denial of Stormwater Infiltration Program 36 <br />Appeal #76 for the property at 2193 Terrace Drive within Area I of the Street and Utility 37 <br />Improvement Program. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Council Member Hull requested the infiltration basin on this property also be moved to the 40 <br />bottom of the priority list. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Mayor Flaherty thanked the residents who put in an appeal for engaging in a conversation with 43 <br />the City and its staff. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.