Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council January 25, 2016 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />Stephen Sandquist, 2343 Hillview Road, also opposed organized trash collection in the City of 1 <br />Mounds View. He suggested a vote be taken this fall in order for the City to clearly hear the 2 <br />voice of the public regarding this matter. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Judy Leverty, 8375 Sunnyside Road, reported she had gone through this process in other cities 5 <br />and indicated it does not work. She feared how the smaller refuse companies would be impacted 6 <br />by Mounds View going with a single hauler. She believed that prices would increase and jobs 7 <br />would be lost. She stated that Mounds View was not a planned community and for this reason, 8 <br />refuse collection decisions should rest with residents. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Adam Larson, 8371 Knollwood Drive, understood the reasons behind the City pursuing a single 11 <br />trash hauler. He indicated a single hauler would assist in preserving the City’s new streets and 12 <br />roadways. He discussed how numerous garbage trucks adversely impacted the streets. He stated 13 <br />he could support a single hauler so long as prices remained low and the residents had some say in 14 <br />the process. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Timothy Holm, 2200 Lois Drive, reported he lives on a cul-de-sac. He reported he did not have a 17 <br />strong opinion one way or the other regarding trash collection. However, he did understand the 18 <br />amount of money that has been invested in the City’s streets and wanted to see them well 19 <br />maintained. He stated he had nine garbage trucks that came down his street every Thursday. For 20 <br />this reason, he believed the Council could look into other ways to collect garbage to reduce the 21 <br />wear and tear on the City’s streets. He suggested the haulers break up the City into segments to 22 <br />reduce the number of trips being made through the neighborhoods. It was his hope that if the 23 <br />Council pursued a single hauler that the current contracts residents have with their refuse hauler 24 <br />be honored. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Steven Fuller, 8370 Pleasant View Drive, stated he has been in big government for over 30 years. 27 <br />He did not believe the City had any business being in the garbage business. It was his 28 <br />professional opinion that the streets were not being adversely impacted by numerous truck trips. 29 <br />He encouraged the Council not to waste further public tax dollars pursuing this item further. He 30 <br />suggested the misuse of public vehicles be investigated by the City instead. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Michael Robinson, 8360 Pleasant View Drive, indicated he and his wife have lived on his street 33 <br />for the past 28 years. He understood that the recent survey results showed that residents were 34 <br />against organized collection. For this reason, he encouraged the Council to go with the majority 35 <br />on this issue. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Edith Johnson, 7580 Knollwood Drive, opposed organized collection in the City of Mounds 38 <br />View. She asked why the Council would pursue a single hauler when the results from the recent 39 <br />survey clearly stated the public was not interested. She understood the City wanted to maintain 40 <br />its pristine streets and questioned if a study had been conducted on the impact numerous refuse 41 <br />haulers had on City streets. She stated garbage trucks weigh 37,000 pounds when empty and up 42 <br />to 50,000 pounds when full. She inquired if City staff had taken this into consideration when 43 <br />engineering the streets. She indicated the City of Bloomington was trying to navigate through 44 <br />this same issue and has already spent $500,000 to date. She encouraged the City of Mounds 45