Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council April 11, 2016 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br /> <br />Licenses in the City of Mounds View, effective May 15, 2016 through November 15, 2016. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Council Member Hull reviewed stats from Ramsey County and Anoka County in terms of liquor 3 <br />store density. He indicated most communities have 1.8 liquor stores per 10,000 people. He 4 <br />stated if the City were to approve another liquor store, Mounds View would have 3.3 liquor 5 <br />stores were 10,000 people. It was his opinion the City did not need another liquor store. He 6 <br />believed the proposed moratorium would assist the Council in addressing a quality of life issue. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Council Member Gunn looked forward to addressing this concern during the moratorium, but 9 <br />also wanted to discuss how brew pubs would be viewed under City Code. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Council Member Meehlhause explained that some communities have municipal owned liquor 12 <br />stores. 13 <br /> 14 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1 (Flaherty opposed) Motion carried. 15 <br /> 16 <br />G. Resolution 8549, Accept MDH Source Water Protection Grant. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Public Works Director Erickson requested the Council accept the MDH Source Water Protection 19 <br />Grant. He noted staff applied for this grant last September and would assist with water 20 <br />protection and education efforts in the City. He indicated the City would be contracting this 21 <br />work with Barr Engineering. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Council Member Meehlhause discussed a recent newspaper article he read regarding 24 <br />contaminated water and asked if Mounds View would ever have this concern. Public Works 25 <br />Director Erickson explained the cities with contaminated water was due to improper treatment 26 <br />chemicals or due to lead service pipes. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Council Member Mueller asked if there were certain years that lead based pipes were used to 29 <br />supply drinking water to homes. Public Works Director Erickson commented this was the case 30 <br />but he was uncertain of the years. He explained lead based pipes were no longer allowed. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Mayor Flaherty asked if the grant would assist in verifying the City’s aquifer was safe. Public 33 <br />Works Director Erickson noted the Department of Health had tested the City’s aquifer recently 34 <br />given the concerns New Brighton was having with their water. He explained the grant would 35 <br />assist with long-term maintenance of the City’s water. 36 <br /> 37 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Hull/Gunn. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 8549, Accept 38 <br />MDH Source Water Protection Grant. 39 <br /> 40 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 41 <br /> 42 <br />8. CONSENT AGENDA 43