My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2016/06/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
Agenda Packets - 2016/06/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:31 PM
Creation date
6/13/2018 4:40:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/13/2016
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Item No: 08G <br />Meeting Date: June 13, 2016 <br />Type of Business: Consent <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Resolution 8596 Exempting Adjoining Property Owners and <br />Occupants from Minnesota Statutes Chapter 344 When <br />Their Land Considered Together Is under 20 Acres <br /> <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />The Governor has signed into law a bill which allows cities to be exempt from Minnesota’s <br />“Partition Fence Law.” In part, the partition fence law is designed to mediate disputes <br />between adjoining landowners by requiring them to share the costs of constructing fences <br />under certain circumstances. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />While the law is generally used in rural areas where fences are required to contain <br />livestock, it applies throughout the state, including the metro area. Recently, landowners in <br />suburban areas have used the partition fence law to force cities to appoint “fence viewers” <br />and go through a costly review process over fence disputes in residential subdivisions. <br /> <br />The exemption can be effectuated by resolution, and would mean that a city council <br />member would not have to serve as a “fence viewer” and mediate the merits and costs of <br />new or repaired fences. Recently, a City was sued because a property owner was <br />displeased with the Fence Viewer’s determination. <br /> <br />The Council discussed this at its May 23, 2016, meeting and suggested that it would be <br />appropriate to opt out of the provisions addressed within MN Statutes 344, meaning the <br />City Code relating to fences would prevail. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution 8596, a resolution exempting <br />adjoining property owners and occupants from Minnesota Statutes Chapter 344 when <br />their land considered together is under 20 acres. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />City Administrator <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.