Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 6 <br /> Staff Report No. <br /> Meeting Date: June 7, 1999 <br /> Type of Business: W. K. <br /> WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; <br /> CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business <br /> Ci of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works <br /> Item Title/Subject: Review of Request for Proposals for City Engineering <br /> Date of Report: June 2, 1999 <br /> The subject of seeking a new consulting engineer has received some discussion in past meetings. <br /> Current projects that SEH is involved with are the Realignment of Edgewood Drive, Upgrade of the <br /> Booster Station, and Woodcrest Wetland Mitigation. Upon completion of these projects, staff sees <br /> very few future projects of any significance in which extensive engineering services will be required. <br /> It appears likely that new construction standards and methods will be adopted by the City Council <br /> for future street construction projects. If the residents wish to simply have their streets overlaid or <br /> milled and overlaid, these are projects of which will require very little outside engineering. Current <br /> staff, with the addition of a seasonal employee or intern and minimal survey equipment, can perform <br /> • the necessary tasks to complete these projects successfully. A registered and designated civil <br /> engineer will be required to sign the City's report to MnDOT to receive MSA funding,both <br /> maintenance and construction funds. <br /> In light of these predictions, staff is suggesting the City advertise for engineering proposals for <br /> general services and select three (3)to five (5) firms to perform any major projects that may occur. <br /> SEH could be retained to provide information and services on minor issue of which they have past <br /> knowledge or experience of City systems. This could prove to be less costly in terms of staff time <br /> which would be required to research files and historical events to provide to a firm which does not <br /> have any prior experience in the City. Since most expenses occur during the early stages of projects, <br /> less engineering time, fewer meetings, and reduced staff and consultant time could lessen the City's <br /> overall contractual engineering services. Major street projects, City land platting, wetland <br /> delineations and plan review could be performed by any of the firms selected. These projects could <br /> be rotated through the list. It is likely that staff will find a possible preference as to a firms abilities, <br /> expenses and turn around time through this process. <br /> The City has utilized several consulting engineers and architects in past projects with various results. <br /> The earlier City Hall addition, Community Center, City Hall HVAC, Environmental surveys,Risk <br /> Management Program, Pedestrian Bridge and general land surveys are a few of the latest projects in <br /> which alternative consulting services have been utilized. <br /> Staff feels this approach could prove to be the most cost effective and efficient for the City, staff, <br /> and projects. Staff is seeking Council's direction in this matter. <br /> /A' .7 <br /> �i ael Ulrich, Director of Public Works <br />