Laserfiche WebLink
ELF. 2420 May 17, 1999 <br /> Version: Conference Committee Report Page 40 <br /> Section <br /> 4 Pre-1982 TIF District Pooling Rules. Sets out "pooling rules" (i.e., the authority to spend <br /> increments from a district on activities outside of the geographic area of the district) for <br /> districts established after July 31, 1979 and before July 1, 1982. Applies only to TIF <br /> districts where the request for certification was made after July 31, 1979 and before July 1, <br /> 1982. <br /> Background information. The 1979 TIF Act explicitly required increment to be spent in <br /> accordance with a TIF plan for the improvement and development of the district. This <br /> limited spending to development or redevelopment of the district. Pooling or spending of <br /> increments for development or redevelopment of other areas (i.e., outside the district) was <br /> not explicitly authorized. The 1982 legislature allowed unlimited pooling of increments, but <br /> these changes were effective only for districts for which the request for certification was <br /> made after June 30, 1982. Thus, these pre-1982 districts have no specific statutory authority <br /> to spend increments on developments outside of the district. In 1990, the legislature <br /> imposed percentage limits on the amount of increments that could be spent outside of the <br /> district. These limits apply to newly certified districts and areas of existing districts. <br /> Exemptions. Increments are not subject to this section, if they were used for debt service <br /> pooling by municipal development districts. (This was a limited pooling authority available <br /> between 1984 and 1990.) Also, the section does not ratify past pooling violations, if the city <br /> voluntarily repaid the increments and decertified the district before legislation was enacted. <br /> Notification by state auditor. The bill requires the State Auditor to notify each <br /> development authority (e.g., a economic development authority or housing and <br /> redevelopment authority) of the provisions of this law. <br /> Ratification of past spending. The bill provides that expenditures on activities outside of <br /> the TIF district are legal if they meet either of two requirements: <br /> ► The expenditures were made before the city or authority was notified by the State <br /> Auditor that spending for the district was not in compliance with the law or December <br /> 31, 1999, whichever occurs first. This notification by the Auditor does not refer to <br /> notice required by this section, but rather would have been part of a compliance audit <br /> by the Auditor or similar circumstances that resulted from a review of the district's <br /> activities. <br /> ► The expenditures were made to pay"pre-existing outside district obligations." <br /> These are obligations that are secured by increments from the district. To qualify <br /> • <br /> bonds must have been issued before the earlier of(1) final notice of noncompliance <br /> from the Auditor or (2) April 1, 1999. To qualify contracts must have been entered <br /> before the earlier of(1) the notice from the Auditor or (2) May 1, 1999. <br /> Article 10: Tax Increment Financing <br />