Laserfiche WebLink
/0 <br /> CITY COUNCIL <br /> MEMO <br /> To: Mounds View City Council <br /> From: James Ericson, Planning Associate <br /> Subject: Preliminary Internet Survey Results <br /> Date: Meeting of June 7, 1999 <br /> Background: <br /> With this last mailing of the utility bills to residents, staff included a short, half-page survey <br /> regarding Internet access. In all, a total of 2985 surveys were sent out. The surveys were <br /> included with utility bills to facilitate a high rate of response, given that practically no effort was <br /> needed to return the survey. The intent of the survey, a copy of which is attached, was to <br /> ascertain (1) how many of our residents had Internet access, (2) how many residents would visit <br /> the City's website, and (3) how many of our"connected" residents would want to be added to an <br /> e-mail list to be notified of City events, public meetings or other municipal information. With this <br /> knowledge, the City would be better able to assess its Internet presence and the effort that goes <br /> into maintaining the site as well as to improve communication between the City and its residents <br /> by providing an alternative means of conveying City information. <br /> Analysis: <br /> As of this writing, the City has received back 996 responses to the Internet survey. While more <br /> responses are expected, their numbers should be minimal, yet will push the total over the one- <br /> thousand mark. This translates (at this point) into a 34.5% rate of response--a percentage <br /> considered quite high for a mailout survey. I would expect the final percentage to be at least <br /> 35%. Of the 996 responses, 530 indicated that someone in their household had Internet access <br /> either at home or work. Thus, more than half(53%) of the respondents have access to the <br /> Internet. This figure was far higher than I had expected. Of those connected, the split between <br /> home and work was practically even--389 responses indicated access from home and 346 <br /> indicated access from work. Many responses (38%) indicated access at both home and work. <br /> Concerning the e-mail list, 272 respondents expressed a desire to be put on a list to be kept <br /> informed of City events and other information. In addition to those responses, we have received <br /> fifteen separate requests via e-mail asking to be added to the City's e-mail list. Again, this total is <br /> far higher than I expected, and am very happy at the response. <br /> The question which received far fewer positive responses than hoped was whether or not <br /> residents had visited the City's website. Of the 530 connected households, only 69 indicated that <br /> they had visited the website, or 13 %. This information, while disappointing, gives staff reason to <br /> believe that if more people knew about the website, more residents would utilize it. This leads to <br /> the only failing of the survey instrument. I had stated in the opening survey paragraph that I <br />