Laserfiche WebLink
Mar-31-99 01:09pm From-KENNEDY & GRAVEN +6123379310 T-098 P.04/08 F-823 <br /> c0981989 Court of Appeals Page 1 of 5 <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> IN COURT OF APPEALS <br /> C0-98-1989 and C9-98-20II <br /> City of Mounds View, <br /> Respondent, <br /> vs. <br /> Metropolitan Airports Commission, <br /> Appellant(C0-98-1989), <br /> Defendant and Counterclaimant(C9-98-2011), <br /> Metropolitan Council, <br /> Intervenor-Defendant (C0-98-1989), <br /> Appellant(C9-98-2011). <br /> Filed March 30, 1999 <br /> Reversed <br /> Harten,Judge <br /> Ramsey County District Court <br /> File No. C9-98-8094 <br /> Donald W. Selzer, Jr.,Andrew T. Voss,Littler Mendelson, P.C.,Multifoods Tower, Suite 3970, 33 <br /> South Sixth Street,Minneapolis, MN 55402 (fur appellant, defendant and counterclaimant <br /> Metropolitan Airport Commission) <br /> Andrew D. Parker, Kelly J. Smits, Matthew E. Johnson, Smith Parker,P.L.L.P., 808 Colwell <br /> Building, 123 North Third Street, Minneapolis, MN 55401 (for intervenor-defendant, appellant <br /> Metropolitan Council) <br /> James M. Strotnmen,Robert C. Long, Kennedy &Graven,Chtd.,470 Pillsbury Center South, 200 <br /> South Sixth Street,Minneapolis,MN 55402 (for respondent) <br /> Considered and decided by Harten, Presiding Judge,Randall,Judge,and Shumaker,Judge. <br /> SYLLABUS <br /> A city seeking to enjoin the planning activity of the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan <br /> Airports Commission does not show irreparable harm by asserting that if a court subsequently <br /> disallows the plan,the city will have spent public planning and administrative funds unnecessarily. <br /> OPINION <br /> HARTEN,Judge <br /> The district court granted respondent City of Mounds View a temporary injunction requiring <br /> appellant lvictropolitan Airport Commission to withdraw its recommendation to appellant <br /> Metropolitan Council that an airport runway be extended. Because respondent failed to show that it <br /> would suffer irreparable harm absent the inunction,we conclude that the district court abused its <br /> http://www courts.state.mn.us/opinions/coa/current/c0981989.html 3/31/99 <br />