My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/04/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/04/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:16 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 4:58:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/5/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/5/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
D. BWSR WCA IMPLEMENTATION CORRECTIVE ACTION POLICY <br /> (Note:BWSR endorsed this policy at the July 1995 meeting.) This policy is to set up an action <br /> process with an acceptable time frame to bring into compliance an LGU that is not properly <br /> implementing/administering the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. <br /> ;Step 1: Board conservationist(BC)has reason to believe that LGU may not be implementing <br /> WCA according to rule and statute. <br /> /BC verifies that the LGU has adopted WCA and has a copy of the act, rule, and <br /> Administrative Manual. <br /> /BC verifies who is administering WCA. (Example: a city may be accused of not <br /> administering/enforcing WCA when in fact they have delegated this responsibility to <br /> the county.) <br /> Step 2: BC compiles information, gathers evidence and develops written documentation. This is <br /> done by meeting with the LGU to obtain information such as Technical Evaluation Panel <br /> (TEP)findings of fact or decision, LGU experience and training, and other background <br /> information. <br /> Step 3: BC notifies regional supervisor of findings and then discusses the situation with BWSR <br /> WCA program staff to determine appropriate action for BC to take. <br /> Step 4: If a significant problem is evident, BC meets with LGU staff to discuss; explains <br /> findings, cites Rule and consequences of poor administration of WCA, and explains the <br /> BC's and BWSR's role in this process. BC will also recommend corrective actions to the <br /> LGU. LGU is informed that BC will conduct a follow up meeting with the LGU within <br /> 30 to 45 (maybe 60) days to determine LGU's compliance with BC recommendations. <br /> Step 5: If appropriate, BC makes written recommendation to LGU for correction of <br /> misadministration. BC documents the LGU's verbal response(agreement/disagreement, <br /> etc.) on actions for corrective measures. <br /> /If LOU response to corrective actions is negative, a meeting with LGU elected <br /> officials will be necessary to present findings and make recommendations. Meeting <br /> is scheduled and held. <br /> ✓If elected officials indicate that the LGU will not comply, a written warning is sent <br /> to LGU elected officials and administering staff specifying that the LGU has 30 days <br /> in which to comply. Move to Step 9. <br /> Step 6: BC notifies the regional supervisor and BWSR WCA staff of discussion with and <br /> recommendations made to the LGU, and meeting held with LGU elected officials. <br /> } <br /> Part I-Program Overview July 1997 <br /> WCA Administration I- 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.