Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 9 M <br /> Meeting Date: 4/12/99 <br /> Staff Report No. <br /> Type of Business:EDAB <br /> WK Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; <br /> CA:Consent Agenda;EDAB:EDA Business <br /> Mounds View City Economic Development Authority <br /> Staff Re ort <br /> To: Mounds View Economic Development Authority <br /> From: Kevin Carroll, Economic Development Coordinator <br /> Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Resolution 99-EDA-108, a Resolution <br /> Approving and Authorizing Execution of an Amended <br /> Development Assistance Agreement with Michael <br /> Investments (Everest Group) Regarding the Building N <br /> Project. <br /> Date of Report: April 8, 1999 <br /> SUMMARY <br /> As you will recall,this issue was addressed at the work session on March 1st, the regular Council/EDA <br /> meeting on March 8th, the Economic Development Commission meeting on March 25th, and the regular <br /> Council/EDA meeting on April 5th. Accordingly, an extensive review of the progress of this matter is <br /> probably not required, but the more recent historical highlights include the following: <br /> • On August 25, 1997, the EDA approved Resolution 97-EDA-67, which dealt with the"original" <br /> Development Assistance Agreement regarding the Building N Project. However,the Agreement <br /> was never executed by the parties. <br /> • On September 14, 1998,the EDA approved Resolution 98-EDA-97, which dealt with a modified <br /> version of the original Development Assistance Agreement. The primary modifications permitted <br /> the construction of a 97,463 sq. ft. building rather than the 103,000 sq. ft. building that was <br /> initially envisioned, and allowed the developer more flexibility with respect to a possible"build-to- <br /> suit" arrangement. This revised version of the Agreement was also never executed by the parties. <br /> • On December 28, 1998, the City Council approved Resolution#5298, which dealt with an <br /> alternate site plan for the Building N Project. The new site plan permitted the construction of <br /> either a 69,000 sq. ft. office/flex/showroom or the larger office/warehouse/manufacturing facility <br /> that had been initially planned. <br />