My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/03/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/03/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:00 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 5:29:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/22/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/22/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
U A,0 , ., n,, <br /> I, <br /> behalf of the City. But, to Councilman's Stigney's point, you could include a paragraph or just a <br /> clause at the end of the resolutions that would say something to this effect, adding this line at the <br /> very end. However, in no event does adoption of this resolution predetermine the Council's action <br /> on this matter,but it will have to come back to the zoning issue anyway. You have to authorize just <br /> to get it in front of the Planning Commission, but you also can't predetermine, so we are simply <br /> allowing to go forward with discussion for the moment. Mr. Long stated we need action to initiate <br /> this. <br /> Mayor Coughlin stated adding at the end of the resolve paragraph, however, in no event does this <br /> action predetermine Council action on this matter. <br /> Mr. Stigney stated this is agreeable with himself,with the understanding that the Council wants us, <br /> the Planning Commission,to change all these zoning laws. <br /> Motion/Second: Stigney/Marty. To approve Resolution 5321, with the added sentence at the end. <br /> Ayes -4. Nays-0. <br /> 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: <br /> A. Long distance phone bills. <br /> Mr. Whiting stated he did not have a chance to discuss this with staff. <br /> Mr. Stigney would like to carry this over because he does not have any significant answer to the <br /> question or the purpose of the long distance phone calls. Mr. Stigney did receive more information <br /> after getting the billing. We have 141 long distance calls. Some of these are close to 30 minutes, <br /> and some are very short. <br /> Mr. Stigney's secondary question is these are all being billed to the phone number 784-3055, which <br /> is our previous old number here. Mr. Stigney has a question is why are new numbers not being used. <br /> Mr. Whiting (inaudible). <br /> Mr. Stigney there is also long distance calls being billed to 717-7400 number. Mr. Stigney did ask <br /> about how this was being controlled. Apparently it is left up to the directors of each department, and <br /> they have no way of knowing who made those calls. Mr. Stigney stated Mr. Whiting indicated that <br /> in the past sometimes they passed an envelope to people to place money in if they have a personal <br /> call to make. Mr. Stigney asks how much has been contributed to this last month's time. Mr. <br /> Stigney asks the purpose of these calls,whether they are needed,whether they.are business-related. <br /> Mr. Whiting (inaudible). <br /> N:\USERS\CHRIS\COUNCIL\MINUTES\MVCCB.MAR6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.