My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/03/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/03/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:00 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 5:29:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/22/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/22/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' P <br /> -ROVL- Li <br /> came up there was a $7000 difference and then by the end of the night things had been slotted <br /> around, and there was a$14,000 difference. This was worked out. The Chiefs contract states he <br /> gets 50% of 960 hours. <br /> Mr. Quick asks for clarification, do you have a contract or statement or anything for percentages. <br /> Mr. Whiting stated only on 950 hours. <br /> Mr. Quick asked if the Chief is covered on that. <br /> Mr. Whiting stated this is a personnel rule. <br /> Ms. Schmidt added it exempts all of the police personnel,the municipal code,provisions code. This <br /> is another reason why this was brought to you. <br /> Mr. Quick stated Council member Marty said he was covered by 65% clause, that is the maximum <br /> number of 960 hours. Mr. Quick asked if there are any other individuals at the PD that are not <br /> covered by the 65% clause. <br /> Ms. Schmidt stated the provision referred to of the code that exempts all police personnel under the <br /> municipal code provision. The union personnel are covered by their contract. The City personnel <br /> are covered by the municipal code provision, so the question before us then is what do we want to <br /> imply to one individual. <br /> Mr. Marty some of the previous information as states under current policy is 50% of 960. This is <br /> to all nonunion employees. That was be a cost to the City of$15,677. <br /> Mr. Whiting (inaudible). <br /> Mr. Marty stated under the current policy the Chief would be due $15,677. <br /> Mr. Quick stated there is no policy. <br /> Mayor Coughlin stated Mr. Marty was referring to the 960 hours,the general nonunion contract. <br /> Mr. Marty stated the difference between that and what was submitted to us tonight was $38,212. <br /> That is an additional cost to the City of another$22,535. <br /> Mr. Whiting (inaudible). <br /> Mr.Marty stated he received a memo from Bruce Kessel stating employees not covered by collective <br /> bargaining agreements have been granted eight hours of sick leave per month, 12 days per year,with <br /> a maximum approval of 960 hours. The current policy for employees not covered by the collective <br /> bargaining agreement is that an employee leaving services of the City is entitled to 100% of their <br /> approved vacation. One half of their approved sick leave, not to exceed 480 hours, which is 960 <br /> N:\USERS\CARIS\COUNCIL\MINUTES\MVCC8.MAR8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.