Agenda Packets - 1999/02/01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• Overall quality -City wants the project done right. -Architect explains the first direction of the city was to design a very cost effective project. The current pricing reflects this concept. -City wants to create a number of add alternates for the project, i.e., brick on the exterior • etching on spancrete partition walls in the open area A)structural elements B)partitions later - Estimated cost increases, $250,000.00 to $300,000.00. -No soil borings have been ordered prior to this date,therefore no soil correction dollars have been added to the project. -Separation is felt very important between the city and VB Diggs space. This was mainly for security reasons. • The Teen Center: -The original concept construction costs had the city direct that half of the teen center be allotted to the city and half to VB Diggs--reason: the entry was to be shared by both parties. -Concern for control/safety brought a decision from the City that the entire teen center --• would be put underneath the City cost. Expense for the teen center/lobby is approximately$210,000.00 additional to the City costs. • General -VB Diggs is to match the exterior of the City materials. • -WAI/Continuum to present schedule and new probable cost adjustments. • Fee Adjustments -Add alternates require 80%of architectural fees if not used--100%if accepted. Initial invoicing will reflect 100%and will be adjusted accordingly. -Separating Children's Home Society will require increased fee percentage due to the size of the project-repetitive work is required at different schedules -also shown in 12.1 of the B141 Owner Architect contract. If there are any corrections to the above meeting minutes, please respond within ten working days of this memo or they will be considered correct. E:1WOR.D\90634\MTGtiIIi I.DOC