My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/01/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/01/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:45:54 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 6:13:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/11/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/11/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
/14 <br /> Item No. <br /> Type of Business: CB <br /> WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; <br /> CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business <br /> City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> To: Mayor and City Council <br /> From: Cari Schmidt <br /> Item Title/Subject: 1999 Pay Plan - Resolution 5302 1999 Compensation Schedule <br /> Date of Report: January 8, 1999 <br /> At the April 28, 1997 City Council meeting,the Council authorized staff to proceed with the <br /> conversion of the job evaluation system from PDI to the Hay evaluation system. The purpose of <br /> this conversion was to comply with Minnesota Statutes 471.994"every political subdivision <br /> must use a job evaluation system in order to determine the comparable work value of the work <br /> performed by each class of its employees. The job evaluation system must be maintained and <br /> updated to account for new employee classes and any changes in factors affecting the comparable <br /> work of existing classes. <br /> Current Options <br /> After a year and a half of review, evaluation and analysis, it was determined that a number of <br /> positions were not being compensated adequately. In order to bring these positions into better <br /> compliance with the market and the internal scale, a set amount of$7,500 was budgeted for these <br /> salary increases above 3%for 1999. <br /> Attached are two separate options for the conversion, each costing approximately $7,500. <br /> Option One gives every employee a 3.00% salary increase for 1999. In addition, those <br /> employees that were determined to be underpaid have an additional sum in the columns entitled <br /> "Set Monthly Dollar Increase" or"1998 monthly adjustment"to bring them into line with <br /> comparable positions in comparable cities (the market). <br /> Option Two gives the employees a percentage increase based upon their current salary compared <br /> to the Hay study in the following percentages: <br /> 1.5%base plus+ <br /> Under more than 25% 3% increase <br /> Under 20%to 25% 2.5% increase <br /> Under 15%to 20% 2.0%increase <br /> Under 10%to 15% 1.5% increase <br /> Under 3%to over 10% 1% <br /> **It is important to note that the bold positions on the chart are unionized positions that have <br /> N:\U SERS\CARIS\HAY I.W PD I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.