My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-11-1999 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
01-11-1999 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:45:54 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 6:13:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/11/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/11/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
uNAPPRov <br /> Mounds View City Council E <br /> December 28, 1998 <br /> L <br /> Page 3 <br /> 6. RESIDENT'S REOUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR <br /> David Janke, 8428 Eastwood Road, asked if staff had gotten an answer to his earlier question in <br /> regard to the Community Center development meeting the guidelines of the City Charter. <br /> Mayor McCarty said the guideline that Janke was referring to is in the Chapter on public <br /> improvements. "This simply means that once a public improvement is approved, if the Council <br /> is seeing an increase in costs on that public improvement, an assessed improvement, if there is <br /> more than a 10 percent increase in cost, from the time of hearings and adoptions,they must <br /> reissue, they must redo the public hearings and allow the community to have input on that. That <br /> doesn't mean that there would be a 10 percent threshold attached to a purchase such as the Bell <br /> Ray Ballroom. The Bell Ray Ballroom vote was an advisory election. It was not a binding <br /> election because there was no bond issue involved." <br /> Mr.Janke said he was disappointed in the results of the Golf Course litigation. He said the only <br /> winner in that episode was the City Attorney,who apparently got paid more than the City <br /> recovered from the litigation. Janke said he was disappointed that the fee on utilities had not <br /> been reduced, as promised. He said he was disappointed in the "heated exchanges" that had been <br /> displayed by Council Members in regard to "micro-management." Janke suggested that maybe <br /> the City does need to be micro-managed. He added,the City needs to be run like a business. <br /> "Everybody's got to be accountable for what they do," he said. <br /> In response, Mayor McCarty, said the energy tax is on a schedule to be eliminated. This <br /> schedule is on track and each two-year period the tax will be reduced by .05 percent until it <br /> disappears. This will give the City the time it needs to pick up the revenue slack from other <br /> sources, most notably the property tax. <br /> Mayor McCarty said if the person that wrote the "anonymous letter" wanted to make himself or <br /> herself known,then the City could respond in an appropriate manner to the complaints stated in <br /> the letter. <br /> Mayor McCarty said temper flare-ups are a natural process of group communication. The <br /> important thing to keep in mind, he said, was the end result of the discussions in which these <br /> temper flare-ups occurred. When the vote is taken the Council moves on and doesn't dwell on <br /> the disagreements. From the Council's perspective, "Mounds View is in good shape and always <br /> has been," Mayor McCarty said. <br /> Mr. Janke expressed his concern that the Golf Course operation will never pay for itself as had <br /> been the original intent when the development occurred. He expressed the same concerns in <br /> regard to the Community Center development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.