Laserfiche WebLink
designations, so that the sidewalks would have some trail use and logic to them, and some do not. <br /> Director of Public Works Ulrich stated another issue in the near future,was Groveland Road, Red <br /> Oak Drive and Highway 10, all possibly state aid roads, and all in close proximity to each other. He <br /> stated the discussion was in regard to which or all of these should have sidewalks. He stated that this <br /> does not presuppose that if you live on an MSA street, you are going to have a sidewalk. <br /> Council Member Stigney clarified that the MSA designation provides the choice for the project that <br /> will support funding for the project. He stated deeming a road an MSA system road, does not mean <br /> anything except that the money is being accrued for use or not, and this would be determined by the <br /> people who reside on that road. He stated this was the same stipulation that Mayor Coughlin had <br /> included in the street Committee's report. He stated this money could accrue, and be used for traffic <br /> lights, and MSA roads. He stated the maintenance funds could also be utilized for any roads in the <br /> City. He stated there are some sizeable amounts being considered, and he thought this would be the <br /> way to go. <br /> Mayor Coughlin requested a motion to extend the meeting for no more than one-half hour. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney. To Extend the Council Meeting For No More Than and Up <br /> To One-half Hour. <br /> Ayes—5 Nays—0 Motion carried. <br /> Mayor Coughlin stated it was his understanding that, until the entire MSA system is certified,the <br /> maintenance dollars can not be utilized on any road, except a designated MSA road. <br /> Director of Public Works stated that the maintenance dollars could be used anywhere. He stated, <br /> theoretically,they are for the maintenance of the MSA roads. He stated they would be for the seal <br /> coating, and every MSA road does not require seal coating every year. He stated they do striping, <br /> plowing, and patching, but they do not seal coat every year, therefore, some of that money is also <br /> put into the street construction fund for capital, and utilized on any roads that require it. He stated, <br /> while this is a decision that would probably have to be lived with forever, County Road I was <br /> currently an MSA road, and would maintain the City's certification for quite some time. He stated <br /> that another street might not. He stated there may be some variances that might be allowed on other <br /> streets to bring them closer to the standard, but they were considering two roads that have just <br /> undergone extensive reconstruction that they hoped would last for a very long time. <br /> Mayor Coughlin inquired if the resolution contained a stipulation indicating that the segment of <br /> County Road I would be added as an MSA status turnback. Director of Public Works Ulrich stated <br /> it did. <br /> Mayor Coughlin stated he had some misgivings regarding the addition of these roads to the MSA <br /> system for the same reasons the Chair of the Streets Policies Committee had indicated. He stated <br /> he was concerned in regard to the certification of the road, although he would acknowledge the road <br /> had just been redone and would probably last for some time to come. <br /> 27 C:\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\8-9-99.CC <br />