Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. <br /> Staff Report No. <br /> Meeting Date: September 20, 1999 <br /> Type of Business: Work Session <br /> WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; <br /> CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business <br /> City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> To: Honorable Mayor & City Council <br /> From: James Ericson, Planning Associate <br /> Item Title/Subject: Request to Allow a Driveway over and across Unimproved City <br /> Right of Way. <br /> Date of Report: September 16, 1999 <br /> Background: <br /> Spencer Mistelske has requested that the City Council consider a proposal to allow for a driveway <br /> to be constructed over and across unimproved City right of way. Mr. Mistelske has entered into a <br /> purchase agreement with the property owners of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Smuder Addition. This <br /> agreement is contingent upon favorable wetland analysis, soil borings and City allowance of said <br /> driveway request. Mr. Mistelske has stated his willingness to sign a limited use agreement which <br /> among other things would absolve the City from any potential liabilities and indemnify and hold <br /> harmless the City in any and all events. He further states that at some point in the future if Laport <br /> Drive is constructed, he acknowledges that he would be accordingly assessed for the adjacent <br /> improvements. <br /> The properties are located to the west of Edgewood Drive on an unimproved section of Laport <br /> Drive. These lots were never built on and the street remains unimproved due to the presence of <br /> wetlands which made construction and installation of utilities prohibitively difficult. It now <br /> appears that after the installation of Highway 10 (formerly known as Trunk Highway 118), the <br /> wetlands south of the highway have been drained and the boundaries shifted to the point where <br /> construction could occur. This has not been verified by a delineation, although studies are <br /> currently being done which should soon shed some additional light on the overall development <br /> potential of this area. <br /> Discussion: <br /> The properties, after an inspection by staff, SEH Inc. and other parties, appear to not be within or <br /> abutting the wetland areas as so indicated on the City's wetland zoning maps, which were created <br /> in the 1980s based on national wetland inventory data and aerial photos. The boundaries as <br /> shown on the wetland zoning maps represent contours or land elevation levels within which the <br /> wetlands were assumed to be contained, and as such, probably do not reflect the actual and true <br /> boundaries of the wetlands in the City. The maps have remained essentially unchanged over the <br /> years, having been produced for reference use only and not intended to be survey-quality <br /> delineations. <br /> That caveat being stated, it can be seen on the attached wetland zoning map that a small section <br /> of the wetland extends onto the northwest corner of the combined lots, which are outlined in bold. <br /> There is clearly room for a driveway to be located on the right of way and onto the property <br /> without encroaching into the wetland. In addition, it can be seen that there is ample room for a <br />