Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. <br /> Meeting Date: September 20. 1999 <br /> Staff Report No. <br /> Type of Business: WK <br /> WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; <br /> CA:Consent Agenda;CB:Council Business <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> Work Session Staff Report <br /> To: Mounds View City Council <br /> From: Kevin Carroll, Economic Development Coordinator <br /> Item Title/Subject: Investigation of Stormwater Handling Options <br /> (Mermaid Project Area) <br /> Date of Report: September 16, 1999 <br /> HISTORY/BACKGROUND: <br /> As you may recall, earlier this year the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic <br /> Development [DTED] awarded the City of Mounds View a grant in the amount of$333,333 <br /> to assist with certain anticipated expenses related to the proposed redevelopment of the <br /> Mermaid site. Our grant application indicated that the majority of the funds would be <br /> devoted to improving surface water drainage and treatment in the Mermaid"project area." <br /> The original plan, as reflected in the grant application, anticipated that the Mermaid owners <br /> would acquire four nearby parcels: the Rent All site, the Cabot Industrial parcel (the flag- <br /> shaped property that includes the existing retention pond and the access road between <br /> County Road H and the business park to the north), the Music Off 10 site, and the <br /> Lambert/Pettibone site. The Mermaid's attorney (Mr. Bob Hajek) has indicated to me that he <br /> has reached agreements with the owners of the Rent All and Music Off 10 sites regarding <br /> mutually acceptable sale/purchase prices. However, Mr. Hajek has indicated that the <br /> owners of the Lambert/Pettibone site have proposed a purchase price that is so much in <br /> excess of the actual market value that the Mermaid cannot or will not be able to acquire it. <br /> In addition, Mr. Hajek reports that he has had significant difficulty getting the owner of the <br /> Cabot site (a real estate trust based in another state, as I recall) to negotiate with him and/or <br /> to even indicate whether a sale of the property would be considered. <br /> The unavailability of the Lambert/Pettibone site and the uncertainty regarding the <br /> availability of the Cabot site create some problems with respect to the original <br /> redevelopment plan. The Lambert/Pettibone site was seen as the desired location for a "new <br /> and improved" stormwater retention pond that would be created to replace the existing pond <br /> (which is located on the Cabot parcel). This new (larger)pond would serve the same area <br /> that the existing pond serves (primarily the business park area located to the north)plus all <br /> of the parcels in the Mermaid project area (which are not currently served by any <br /> stormwater holding pond). However, if the Lambert site is not available, the pond would <br />