My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/09/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/09/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:13 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 7:00:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/27/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/27/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 23, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 29 <br /> Council Member Stigney stated he did not have a copy of the resolution, and inquired if the <br /> information provided was strictly preliminary. Finance Director Kessel stated this was correct. <br /> He explained the amounts stated could not be exceeded, however, they could be amended <br /> downwards. <br /> K. Consideration of Resolution 5368, a Resolution Authorizing an Increase in <br /> the City's Property Tax Rate for the Year 2000. <br /> Finance Director Kessel provided the Council with a copy of a facsimile from Ramsey County <br /> which lists the preliminary tax capacity and market values for payable 1999 and 2000 taxes. He <br /> explained the total tax capacity value for local rates has increased by $245,192.00 for pay in <br /> 2000, versus pay in 1999. He explained that this represents an approximate increase of 5 percent <br /> in the City's tax capacity. <br /> Finance Director Kessel stated the City's levy limit is less than one percent based upon the <br /> formula that the state utilizes. He explained this represents a tax rate increase. He explained that <br /> although the denominator is increasing more than the numerator, the rate would actually go <br /> down, however, the method the state uses to calculate the property tax increase indicates that it <br /> has increased. <br /> Finance Director Kessel explained that in order to levy the maximum levy, the state requires <br /> there be a resolution on the books authorizing an increase in the tax rate as they define it, and this <br /> is required to be completed prior to October 20. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Marty. To Approve Resolution No. 5368, a Resolution <br /> Authorizing a property Tax Rate Increase for the Year 2000, Pursuant to Stated Statutes. <br /> Ayes—3 Nays—0 Motion carried. <br /> Council Member Thomason was not present for the vote. <br /> L. Consideration of Ordinance 641, an Ordinance Implementing a Franchise <br /> Fee on Electric and Natural Gas Utility Companies for the Operation of the <br /> Utility with the City. <br /> L.1. First Reading of Said Ordinance <br /> Finance Director Kessel stated this was the First Reading of Ordinance 641. He explained that <br /> this ordinance was the same as the ordinance approved the previous year, with the exception of <br /> the addition of Reliant Energy/Minnegasco. He stated the item that should be considered prior to <br /> Second Reading and adoption of this ordinance is Subdivision 3, the amount of the Franchise <br /> Agreement. He stated there has been some discussion in the past regarding lowering the feet to <br /> two percent, and also discussion regarding increasing the fee and earmarking a portion of it to a <br /> street reconstruction fund. He explained that the language currently indicates the Franchise <br /> Agreement of the sales of electric and natural gas within the City will be 2.5 percent, which is <br /> the present rate. <br /> Finance Director Kessel stated another item for consideration is Section 8, the Sunset Clause, <br /> which indicates the ordinance will automatically sunset on December 31, 2001. He explained <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.