My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/10/04
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/10/04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:21 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 7:37:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/4/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/4/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
with the City? Obviously money is part of it, but other factors such as job satisfaction, personal <br /> development and morale must have a place. This too should be looked into. It does not have to be the <br /> top priority of the community to keep employees happy, but a sense of belonging to a community can <br /> play a major role. Coming from the outside into the community, it is not always clear where the <br /> "community"resides in a suburban city. This can lead to skepticism of employee's motives on the <br /> one hand and a sense of rejection from the employees themselves on the other. Does that sense exist <br /> and what affect does it have on the productivity of the organization is another question to look into. <br /> And finally, is it clear enough as an organization what we are trying to achieve? I sometimes think <br /> that the purpose of this organization is not clear enough. Staff, like anyone else, will attempt to find <br /> meaning in their work. Where meaning is not clear, other objectives will develop. Where the group <br /> purpose is not established, individual goals will develop which can lead to leaving the organization. <br /> Granted, the council turnover of the past few years may put that question beyond the immediate, but <br /> every individual in the community has an idea of how it wants its community to be. Identifying that <br /> amidst the realities of region and world is rarely easy. <br /> As for 2000, a 3% adjustment is calculated for the budget and I am hearing that figure around the <br /> metro. With other budget concerns, it seems impossible to consider more. Over the coming years <br /> however, the City may be faced with choosing between services and staffing for those services. For <br /> now recognizing two union contracts coming, a number needs to be in the budget, but addressing <br /> overall personnel needs and affordability should be a primary concern to address in the coming year. <br /> Airport Issues I understand City Attorney Long met with the Council and discussed options for <br /> pursuing legislation and/or litigation on the airport matter. Some discussion on this and a number to <br /> plug into the budget would be helpful in determining the final budget for this issue. As for the budget, <br /> one concern for Council long term is the extent to which the City can pursue issues like this. Over the <br /> past three years I have been with the City, Bruce and I have looked for and changed budget gimmicks <br /> that free up funds without pushing the tax levy. Unfortunately, I don't think many more of those can <br /> be found. This issue and the community center transfer are two areas that if reduced provide room for <br /> either growth in the budget or for funds to address other issues. Assuming the core group of services <br /> and administrative support cannot be curtailed, eventually either other revenues will need to be sought <br /> or more drastic cuts into services and staff will be needed. <br /> Contracted Services One area that gets staff's attention at this time of year is the cost of the City's <br /> legal work and other contracted services. Bruce and I are meeting with Bob Long to review the <br /> retainer agreement and to determine what can be done differently or better. As discussed at the last <br /> budget work session, some options appear to exist, but the reliance on the city attorney by staff and <br /> Council seems to need some refinement to keep it in line with the budget. <br /> We are also preparing for soliciting RFPs from engineering firms. Right now, materials for the <br /> Council should be ready by the November work session. We should also be able to review more <br /> closely the operations of the community center and the contracts the City has for service there. I will <br /> need Bruce to review these prior to that meeting. <br /> As for the fire agreement, Mounds View's cost is remaining steady mostly because the city is not <br /> growing like Blaine or Spring Lake Park. The city seems to be getting a great deal from belonging to <br /> the department, but some attention to the growth characteristics in Blaine in the next couple of years <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.