My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/10/25 (2)
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/10/25 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:42 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 7:42:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/25/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/25/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO <br /> TO: Chuck Whiting <br /> FROM: John Hammerschmidt <br /> TOPIC: Truck Report <br /> DATE : October 18,1999 <br /> REQUEST: Copy to City Council <br /> It has come to my attention that their has been constant questioning about the cost of the golf <br /> course pickup, the lettering on the pickup, the use of the old pickup, and possible improper use of <br /> the new pickup. Unfortunately even after all these questions have been answered in a public <br /> format and documentation provided, new questions are being asked or statements being made that <br /> seem mistrustful and somewhat inappropriate. Hopefully I can clear up any confusion regarding <br /> this issue so that nobody has to waste anymore time on this issue. <br /> The cost of the pickup was $21,500. With tax and liscence the total was $24,682, not the $35,000 <br /> that Mr. Janke keeps bringing up at council meetings. The lettering on the pickup was delayed by <br /> wrong colors, wrong letters, and scheduling conflicts, but has been put on with many compliments <br /> on the design. The old pickup was worth $1,200 and instead of surplusing it, I have kept it to <br /> serve as both a partial replacement for our utility vehicles, (those vehicles cost $14,000 ea.), and <br /> as a second vehicle for running errands. I'm assuming that questions regarding improper use of <br /> the vehicle revolve around the mistaken idea that we are open nine to five, five days a week, <br /> instead of 6:00 AM to 9:00 PM seven days a week. I should also note that most evenings I return <br /> to do irigation work, repair work, or security checks after hours. <br /> If you would prefer that I use my own vehicle for many of these miles and just expense the <br /> mileage please let me know. Up to this point I have just followed our current policies. I am <br /> confused what the exact issue is and would appreciate it if you or the council had some <br /> unanswered questions that need to be addressed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.