My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-25-1999 CC
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
10-25-1999 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2018 7:46:00 AM
Creation date
6/14/2018 7:45:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/25/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Os4 AAA4-eis <br /> IX. Attempts to Avoid Violations <br /> In 1997, the TIF Act was amended by adding a definition of"tax increment." Tax increment, for <br /> example,includes interest and other earnings from investing tax increment. Minn. Stat. §469.174, <br /> subd.25. This portion of the definition,however,is effective only for TIF dis .:th certification <br /> request dates after July 31, 1979 and investment earnings received afte' my 1, 199 Laws 1997, <br /> ch. 231, art. 10, sec. 2 and 25. TIF authorities have argued that the Legis ature s decision to make <br /> the definition of tax increment apply only to interest on tax increment received after the effective <br /> date means interest received before the effective date is not tax increment. The OSA has accepted <br /> this argument. <br /> Some municipalities have attempted to avoid violations of the TIF Act by arguing that the money <br /> their TIF authorities spent allegedly in violation of the TIF Act was interest on tax increment <br /> received before the effective date of the definition. Therefore,according to the TIF authorities,they <br /> did not violate the TIF Act by spending the interest,because the interest was not tax increment,and <br /> the requirements and prohibitions in the TIF Act apply only to tax increment or kinds of money <br /> treated like tax increment,such as proceeds of tax increment bonds. <br /> The OSA will accept this argument if the municipality can demonstrate that the money its TIF <br /> authority spent in a manner not authorized or prohibited by the TIF Act was non-tax increment rather <br /> than tax increment. It may be impossible,however,for a municipality to demonstrate that its TIF <br /> authority used non-tax increment for such expenditures,because frequently TIF authorities do not <br /> have systems of accounts that will allow them to determine which kind of money was spent on <br /> which expenditures.' <br /> In addition,when a TIF authority discovers that it has violated the TIF Act because it has spent tax <br /> increment in a manner not provided in the TIF plan,it frequently will respond by amending the TIF <br /> plan to authorize the previously unauthorized expenditures.' It is the OSA's position that a TIF-plan <br /> modification cannot be effective retroactively. <br /> Example 1 <br /> Facts: In late 1984, the New Dublin HRA creates Development District 3. According to the TIF <br /> plan for TIF District 3-1,certain redevelopment activities in Development District 3 are to be funded <br /> 2 It appears that many TIF authorities have failed to set up adequate systems of accounts for <br /> their TIF districts, even though the TIF Act requires TIF authorities to segregate tax <br /> increment from each TIF district in a special account separate from all other kinds of money. <br /> Minn. Stat. § 469.177, subd. 5 (1996) (originally enacted as Minn. Stat. § 273.76, subd. 5 <br /> (1979)). <br /> ' Tax increment from a TIF district may be spent or transferred only as provided in the <br /> district's TIF plan. Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 4. <br /> Legal Compliance Issues <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.