Laserfiche WebLink
BRIGGS AND MORGAN • <br /> are effective only for post-July 31, 1979 TIF districts and for earnings received after <br /> July 1, 1997. Where does that leave increment (arid earnings thereon) from pre-1979 <br /> districts and earnings on increments (from post-1979 districts) received before July <br /> 2, 1997? There is a difference of opinion on that question. I have generally thought <br /> that earnings on increment should be accounted as such, which means that those <br /> dollars too are subject to all the rules applicable to the expenditure of tax increment. <br /> I have not necessarily changed that view, and strictly speaking I'm not sure an <br /> inference either way should be taken from this legislative action. The key element <br /> may be whether or not the State Auditor will cite violations in cases where authorities <br /> have accounted for such investment earnings as something other than tax increments. <br /> The effective date for items (2) and (3) above, dealing with money derived from the <br /> sale or lease of property purchased with increment and repayments of loans or other <br /> advances made out of increment, is also important. My view has always been that <br /> as a general rule such monies would not be reclassified as tax increments. " This <br /> change now means that some of them will be, specifically,the proceeds from the sale <br /> or lease of property which was purchased after June 30, 1997, and repayments of <br /> loans that were made after June 30, 1997, but this applies only to increment from <br /> districts requested for certification after June 30, 1982. Note that if the property <br /> were purchased or the loan were made on or before June 30, 1997, the revenues <br /> from the sale or lease thereof, or the loan repayments, would not be classified as <br /> . increment even if the actual receipt of those monies occurred after June 30, 1997. <br /> B. "Small Cities"Get A "Commercial"Break: Economic Development Districts. Small <br /> cities can now establish economic development tax increment districts to provide <br /> assistance to up to 15,000 square feet of commercial facilities, which is a use that <br /> otherwise would not generally qualify for economic development district treatment. <br /> "Small city" means a city having a population of 5,000 or fewer residents that is not <br /> located within 10 miles of a Minnesota city with a population of 10,000.or more. The <br /> distance between the two cities must be measured by drawing a straight line from the <br /> nearest municipal boundaries. Population is to be determined by the most recent <br /> federal census,a special census conducted by the United State Bureau of the Census, <br /> a population estimate made by the Metropolitan Council, or a population estimate <br /> made by the State demographer. <br /> A second exception which may benefit a few small cities is the establishment of <br /> economic development districts for "qualified border retail facilities,"w;.,ch means a <br /> shopping center or one or more retail stores located in the small city which is within <br /> one mile or less of the State line. The development must contain new buildings or <br /> substantially rehabilitate existing buildings that together contain at least 25,000 square <br /> feet of retail space. This sounds like special legislation in the garb of general law and <br /> will most likely have relatively rare applicability. These changes are effective for tax <br /> increment areas requested for certification after June 30, 1997. <br /> 357509.1 2 <br />