My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/10/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/10/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:41 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 7:45:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/25/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/25/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Case No. 571-99 <br /> Doroff Shed CUP <br /> October 25, 1999 <br /> Page 3 <br /> (1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and <br /> other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. <br /> (7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. <br /> (8) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities have been or <br /> will be provided <br /> The addition of a storage shed, even one as large as that proposed, would not create a <br /> greater impact on existing public facilities or services, on utilities or access roads, nor <br /> would it create an increase in traffic on adjacent streets. <br /> (2) The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from <br /> adjacent residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be <br /> depreciated in value and there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land <br /> (3) The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse <br /> effect upon adjacent residential properties. <br /> The location of the shed behind the home and garage would hide it from general public <br /> view. Because of the tall fence surrounding the backyard area, the shed itself would be <br /> screened even from the adjoining properties as well. The shed would have a barn-like <br /> design, similar to one on an adjacent property, and would neither be incompatible with nor <br /> detrimental to this district. <br /> (4) The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall <br /> needs of the City and to the existing land use. <br /> (5) The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of <br /> the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. <br /> (6) The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Sheds and out-buildings are typical uses in residential areas, and allow for the storage of <br /> yard and garden equipment . Having this shed will allow the property owners to replace a <br /> dilapidated metal shed and to store items currently left outside within a secure and <br /> protected structure. <br /> Staff and the Planning Commission believes that this proposal meets the general requirements as <br /> indicated above. In addition to these general conditional use permit criteria, Section 1106.04, <br /> Subdivision 7 lists the specific criteria which need to be met in order to approve a conditional use <br /> permit for an over-sized shed. The criteria with responses are as follows: <br /> a. The accessory building must conform with Section 1103.06 of this Title and <br /> subdivision 1106.03(l) of this Title. <br /> This section of the Code dictates where in the yard an accessory building can be located. <br /> The proposed shed would be located in the rear yard, which is the only place a shed can be <br /> located according to the Code. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.