Laserfiche WebLink
Chuck Whiting <br /> From: Riggs, Scott J. [sriggs@Kennedy-Graven.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, October 25, 1999 4:47 PM <br /> To: 'chuckw@rcmnet.org' <br /> Cc: Long, Robert C. <br /> Subject: Non-retainer legal work procedure <br /> Chuck: <br /> I am writing this memorandum in follow-up to the meeting on October 15, 1999 <br /> among yourself, Bruce Kessel, Rick Jopke, Bob Long and myself, as to <br /> establishing a procedure to help control the cost of legal work to be <br /> performed for the city by Kennedy & Graven, Chartered. It is my <br /> understanding that Bob Long has forwarded a revised Agreement for Legal <br /> Services (the "Agreement") which reflects some of the conclusions we <br /> reached. In addition, I am forwarding via this memorandum an initial <br /> outline as to how "non-retainer" legal matters will be processed in the <br /> city. <br /> At the time any legal matter comes within the definition of "non-retainer" <br /> pursuant to the Agreement, a form will be forwarded to you and the staff <br /> member who requested the legal work. The form will state the matter is <br /> designated as a non-retainer matter. The form will need to be appropriately <br /> acknowledged by you (or a designated department head) before any legal work <br /> or costs are incurred by the city. <br /> Pass-through legal work for developers, etc. (generally involving the <br /> planning department) will be reviewed and approved in the same manner. It <br /> was discussed that the city would institute a practice for developers, etc. <br /> whereby a fee schedule will be established and collected before any work is <br /> performed or a developer's application is accepted by the city for <br /> processing. Such a fee schedule will permit the city to collect an initial <br /> amount for the work to be performed by the city so that the city is not in <br /> the position of attempting to collect fees from a developer for work <br /> performed by the city for the developer's benefit. The fee to be collected <br /> from developers should be worked into the application process the city <br /> presently utilizes. <br /> As noted, no non-retainer legal work will be performed unless approved by <br /> the city. The form which I would suggest for use would basically constitute <br /> the draft as follows: <br /> ***** <br /> NON-RETAINER WORK REQUEST FORM <br /> The work requested to performed, which is as follows: <br /> is covered under the non-retainer definition of the Agreement for Legal <br /> Services between the City of Mounds View and Kennedy & Graven Chartered. <br /> The estimate for legal fees to be incurred for this matter <br /> is: <br /> Such non-retainer work is approved up to the estimated amount by <br /> on , and work on this matter should begin. <br /> Such non-retainer work is disapproved by on <br /> and no work should be performed for this matter. <br /> Mailed copy sent <br /> 1 <br />