Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 25, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 12 <br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated this was the intent, and staff would clarify this in the language <br /> of the resolution. He added that staff would examine this matter when the building plans are <br /> reviewed. <br /> Mayor Coughlin asked if the motioner and seconder would agree to amend the motion. <br /> Council Members Thomason and Quick agreed. <br /> Ayes—4 Nays—0 Motion carried. <br /> C. Review of Charter Commission Response to City Council Request for <br /> Consideration of Charter Amendments. <br /> City Administrator Whiting stated he has received a letter date October 14, 1999, from Julie <br /> Olsen, Chair of the Mounds View Charter Commission. He read the letter as follows: <br /> The Mounds View Charter Commission has reviewed your letter dated August 12, 1999. We <br /> will be needing additional information in order to complete the review of the charter revisions as <br /> requested. <br /> Point 1) Charter Section 3.01 —as to "council meetings" <br /> • We are requesting the city to provide us with the State law and or City code that the <br /> council is reciting from. <br /> Point 2) Charter Section 4.02—as to "filing for office" <br /> • Would like to see where in the State of Minnesota Constitution that this is addressed. <br /> • Would like the case law of Minnesota Term Limits Coalition V. Keefe. <br /> Point 3) Charter Section 5.05 —as to "initiative", "resolutions" <br /> • A copy of the city attorney's letter dated June 28, 1998 <br /> • Copy of the State law that your letter is referring to <br /> • Copies of Case law involving charter cities that your letter is referring to <br /> Point 4) "Voting majority for zoning amendments" <br /> • Need state law definition of 2/3rds majority. <br /> City Attorney Long advised, in regard to Point 1, Minnesota State Statutes, Section 471.705 <br /> Subdivision 1C (b), pertaining to Special Meetings state that at least three days notice is required <br /> prior to holding a special meeting. He explained, at the time the City Charter was written, the <br /> Special Meeting Section did not exist, therefore, the Charter indicates "upon at least 24 hours <br /> notice." He advised the Charter is presently in conflict with State Statutes, and State Law, <br /> generally applied, indicates that the charters of cities need to be in compliance with State Statutes <br />