My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-15-1999 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
11-15-1999 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:08 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 7:53:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/15/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/15/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 25, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 21 <br /> Director of Public Works explained that the letters were fixed. He added that a short message <br /> would flash, and a longer message would travel across the sign. <br /> Council Member Stigney stated the number of words they typically utilize on the current signage <br /> would not fit on the sign scale indicated in the staff report. He inquired if the proposed sign <br /> would be able to convey they type of message the City currently displays on the existing sign. <br /> Director of Public Works Ulrich stated the proposed sign would provide viewing of more words <br /> per second than the current sign. <br /> Council Member Stigney inquired if he would be able to read the entire message on the sign as <br /> he drives by, and be able to understand the complete message. <br /> Director of Public Works Ulrich stated the sign would scroll through three or four messages at a <br /> time, and if a person was stopped at the traffic light, they may be able to read 7 to 8 minutes <br /> worth of messages. <br /> Council Member Stigney clarified that as he presently drives by City Hall, he is able to see a <br /> number of words displayed on the sign, which convey a message. He explained there are an <br /> average number of words utilized in these messages, and inquired if, on average, this sign would <br /> have the ability to convey the same messages that are currently displayed. He pointed out this <br /> was important, as shorter messages are not typically utilized. He inquired if the proposed sign <br /> would indicate a loss or a gain of message capacity. <br /> Director of Public Works Ulrich stated the electronic sign would represent a gain. He explained <br /> the present sign utilizes four lines with 35 letters that are visible at one time, however, the <br /> proposed sign, which is more legible and visually appealing, utilizes four lines, with two flashing <br /> first, and two reappearing after the first part of the message has been read. <br /> Council Member Stigney inquired if two lines would convey the same amount of message in the <br /> same time frame as the four-line sign that presently exists. <br /> Director of Public Works Ulrich stated it would. He explained that some messages would run <br /> for 30 seconds, and convey more, and others could be conveyed in 10 second. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Coughlin. To Award the Bid Amount of $47,038.55 to Aim <br /> Electronics, and Authorize Staff to Proceed with the Purchase of a Two-Line Electronic Message <br /> Board, With the Shortfall of$7,038.55 to Come Out of the Contingency Fund. <br /> Council Member Quick stated this sign will improve communications by a quantum leap. <br /> Mayor Coughlin requested staff advise in regard to an additional funding source. <br /> Finance Director Kessel stated the contingency on the 1999 budget was $48,000, and two items <br /> for which they transferred some money out of the Contingency Fund this year. He explained <br /> there was a transfer in the range of$6,000 to $8,000, for what purpose, he was uncertain, and the <br /> airport litigation, which is over budget, is in the range of approximately $20,000 to $30,000. He <br /> stated there was possibly one other item on the expense side of this fund. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.