My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-22-1999 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
11-22-1999 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:10 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 7:58:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/22/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/22/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council <br /> Regular Meeting November 15, 1999 <br /> Page 13 <br /> City Attorney Long stated in light of the discussion at the Commission meeting, this was his <br /> recommendation. He stated that having specific language to respond to would provide clarity to <br /> the Commission in terms of what is being requested, and they could then utilize their authority to <br /> make those amendments by ordinance to the Council. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Coughlin/Marty. To Authorize Legal Staff to Recommend Proper <br /> Language to Change the Charter So it is in Keeping Fully with State Statutes and the Minnesota <br /> Supreme Court Rulings, Present this Language to the Charter Commission for a Final Response <br /> from the Charter Commission and for the Charter Commission to Bring this Forward to the City <br /> Council, As Amended to Indicate the Commission Report Back No Later than the February <br /> Meeting of the Charter Commission, and If there are Any Questions, Concerns, or Points of <br /> Order to be Made, They be Made In a Timely Manner, Prior to that Deadline. <br /> City Administrator Whiting stated staff could complete this language within the next three <br /> weeks, and it would be forwarded to the Charter Commission for review at their January <br /> meeting. He stated at their February meeting, the Charter Commission would formalize their <br /> response, if that is sufficient time, and the Council could expect a response in February. <br /> Mayor Coughlin stated he would amend the motion to indicate the Commission report back no <br /> later than the February meeting of the Charter Commission, and if there are any questions, <br /> concerns or points of order to be made, they be made in a timely manner,prior to that deadline. <br /> Council Member Marty stated he would agree to this amendment. <br /> Council Member Stigney requested clarification. He explained at the Charter Commission <br /> meeting in January, the Commission would review the City Attorney's language, and perhaps <br /> move forward with that as a response. He pointed out all items might not be able to be addressed <br /> at that time, and during the meeting they had discussed that each of the items would be handled <br /> separately. He inquired if the Council was requesting a bundled response, or simply a response. <br /> Mayor Coughlin stated the Council expected a reaction one way or the other. <br /> Council Member Marty stated there would be two meetings for this discussion, and he <br /> understood the motion to indicate that staff would prepare the ordinances, and submit them to the <br /> Charter Commission for review in the January and February meetings. <br /> Julie Olsen, Charter Commission Chair stated the Charter Commission would meet in January to <br /> discuss the issues, and City Attorney Long indicate he would be happy to return for the dialogue. <br /> She explained at the Charter Commission meeting in November, the Commissioners had just <br /> received their packet information, however, nothing had been reviewed other than what had been <br /> discussed, and she was of the understanding that all were in agreement that further discussion <br /> was necessary. She added she also understood that the points would be potentially considered <br /> item by item. She stated it was not possible to review all of the items at the January meeting. <br /> Ms. Olsen explained that the Commission received staff's letter in August, after their August <br /> meeting. She stated the Commission reviewed the information in September, writing down their <br /> questions and concerns, which required research, and the matter had to come back at the next <br /> meeting for approval, as it requires a unanimous vote. She stated the Charter Commission does <br /> not have legal or administrative staff to conduct the research and create the documents, rather the <br /> Commission members do this themselves. She stated she could not draft a document based upon <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.