Laserfiche WebLink
lob <br /> City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> To: Mayor and members of the City Council <br /> From: Bruce A. Kessel, Finance Director <br /> Item Title/Subject: NSP request for changes in implementation of franchise fee on electric <br /> and natural gas sales <br /> Date of Report: November 18, 1999 <br /> Jim Strommen from Kennedy& Graven and City staff have been contacted by NSP relating to the <br /> recently enacted franchise fee on electric and natural gas sales within Mounds View. There are several <br /> issues that have been raised including: <br /> 1. Y2K issues. <br /> My understanding is that NSP has instituted a policy of not making any programming changes to <br /> its systems until after the middle of January. Their reasoning is that while they feel that their <br /> systems are Y2K compliant, they do not want to change any program code until after the first of <br /> the year since any changes could hamper their Y2K preparedness. Also, they wish to reserve <br /> technology personnel to fix any Y2K problems that are encountered on January 1 and as such, do <br /> not want to make commitments to change systems early in the year 2000. <br /> 2. Method of implementation/deregulation. <br /> In recent years, federal laws have been passed to deregulate electric and natural gas. Various states <br /> have also undertaken deregulation. Deregulation is in the early stages in Minnesota, however there <br /> are some larger customers who have received authority to purchase energy from alternative <br /> sources. As such, NSP is concerned that if any user in Mounds View receives such authority,NSP <br /> will be at a competitive disadvantage since it would have to charge the City's franchise fee while a <br /> competitor would not. The impact on the City of the competitor being awarded the contract is that <br /> the City would not receive its franchise fee on such energy sales. (Note in some cases, the <br /> alternative supplier would use NSP infrastructure and would pay NSP for such use, however, such <br /> a fee is a small fraction of the total billings and as such, the City's franchise fee would be on only <br /> the infrastructure charge). <br /> Options <br /> Attached is one option that NSP has proposed to implement the franchise fee. As you will note, the <br /> percentage of the bill varies, however, the total franchise fee generated would still equal the 4% <br /> specified in the franchise ordinance. We have also requested Fee Estimate reports using a 4% <br /> across the board fee and expect to have such reports prior to the Council meeting. <br /> There has also been discussions about leaving the franchise fee at 2.5% in January and then <br /> increasing it to 4% in February, or another option to a rate somewhat higher than 4% for the rest of <br /> the year so that the average rate for the year 2000 equaled 4%. <br /> Jim Strommen from Kennedy & Graven as well as representatives from NSP will be in attendance <br /> at Monday's meeting to expand upon these issues. <br />