My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-06-1999 WS & TNT
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
12-06-1999 WS & TNT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:31 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 8:28:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/6/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/6/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUNSHINE PRINTING TEL NO .305 451-3752 Dec 02 ,99 16 :51 P .02 <br /> Grinder for reels—Hold due to budget <br /> 'These projects will be part of the comprehensive plan that is being worked on for the`Big woods' <br /> Budget 2000 <br /> After doing a down and dirty version of the budget for 2000 I still had a negative cash flow of about <br /> $60,000.After another staff meeting where we cut everything for 2000 that would not immediately decrease <br /> revenues and increased everything we thought was possible,we came up with a balanced budget.This <br /> budget does not take into account depreciation and contributes nothing to any kind of reserves we should <br /> have on hand. <br /> As you can see we put almost everything that was planned for projects on hold.How long can we put <br /> everything on hold before it starts to affect revenues or moves larger costs into the fihture,is an important <br /> topic to discuss at our work session. <br /> Concourse business expansion: <br /> The last four years I have presented opportunities that we could pursue in order to make the golf course <br /> have a positive cash flow.These opportunities are still available.Each year they are not acted on costs <br /> money for revenue not earned and will cost more to do as construction costs go up. <br /> Even though it's not pleasant to hear,I need to repeat the rule of thumb for financing golf courses.To break <br /> even you need to charge$10 for every million dollars in costs.Our course cost 3.1 million and we can not <br /> charge$31.00 for a round of golf. We also had many unanticipated problems that needed to be fixed. <br /> Obviously it was built to run at a deficit. <br /> Six projects have been proposed to produce revenues and have positive cash flows.Adding another nine <br /> holes,lighting the course for night golf,expanding the practice range and using it year round,adding a pitch <br /> and putt short course,mini golf,and putting in food and bar service have been discussed.The other item <br /> brought up last spring was billboards.Most of these projects will produce significant positive cash flow <br /> immediately. <br /> I have used every means possible to offset this deficit.Can you picture what the debt would be if we were <br /> doing just as well as the other courses instead of outperforming them almost two to one?One other <br /> reminder on costs is that hundreds of thousands of dollars have been saved by doing major projects in-house <br /> and not contracting them out.This work was all done outside of the requirements put in my contract. <br /> There is three years left under my current agreement and I would like to have the city council give <br /> authorization to either modify the existing contract or draw up a new long term one.I feel that I have proven <br /> myself a good steward of the golf course and would like a long-term commitment before we start on this <br /> next phase of the golf course plan. <br /> Summary: <br /> The Bridges Golf Course is an incredibly successful operation that every person in Mounds View can be <br /> proud of.Some people in the community were told that the golf course would be this huge moneymaker <br /> immediately.They also thought that there would be few if any up front costs to develop this course after the <br /> construction was over.For some reason instead of trying to find a way to solve these problems and get <br /> behind this operation they have sat on the sidelines running the golf course down.Does this make any <br /> sense?The more they run down the golf course,the fewer people will come and we will lose more money. <br /> Because of this there has been a reluctance to look at this operation from a business view rather than a <br /> political view. <br /> What do other cities do? Several just subsidize the operation each year with the idea that a golf course like <br /> a park,a hockey arena,or a community center adds value to the community.Some manage to pay for the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.