09-09-1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• • EDA.Meeting#26 August 12, 1996 Page 2 - , 1 PUBLIC IEA QS 3 There were no Public Hearings scheduled for this meeting. • 4 5-. .fRA BUB sst= 6 7 A. Consideration;of Authorizing Wetland-Delineation Study for Highway 10 Redevelopment Area 8 Section 7.:' 9 10 Ms,Bennett expled that Pam Sheldon and herself met with developers who have indicated=interest in 11; :"development of ptoperty directly across Hightty 10 f'om City Hail. It is her feeling that development of. 12 tbis,;ptroperty would have amajorsimpact on the i ittire direction of the redevelopment of Highway 10. She 13 noted that the property does have'a large wetland.and she has discussed the impact of.the.wetland on the, 14 possibility of developn4ent with pocky Keehn of SE11 The wettand area is,based on the National Wetland 1 S ' Inventory Maps and iota site delineation .,Mr.Keehn has suggested that the wetlandxbe delineated so that • 16 ':the city-will know how much of theproperty can actually:be developed. "Additionally,once a delineation • 17 is made,the city can review how a development will impact the city's Local Water Management Plan. - 18- 19 Ms,,Bennett suggested that the city pursue delineation of theproperty to assist M the future development • 20 marlcetfor the.pr'operty. The proposedcost is estimated to be$1,500'which wouldbe•funded through 21 eiisting taxi increment administrative revenues. • • 22 23 " MOTION/SECOND: flanlmer/Bianebard to Authorize SEE to Perform a Wetland Delineation Study for 24 Highway 10 Redevelopment Area Section 7,to be funded through existing tax increment administrative 25 revenues 26 27 VOTE: 5 ayes, 0 nays Motion Carried 28 29 " B. Consideration of Resolution No.'96.EDAw51,Authorizing the Economic,Development Commission 30 " to Work on a Request for.Proposal and Solicit Bids for the Development of'it Vision and Schematic 31<' Plan for Highway 10 Redevelopment Area Section 9.. ` 32 33 Ms:Bennett tinted;that in April the Economic Development Authority looked at different development 34 sections along 1 ighway 10 and identified three priority areas: Section 9 is located front County Road Ito 33 Silver Lake Road. 36 37 Ms.Bom ett stare#she had;met with the Economic Development Commission to strategize how to proceed • 38_ with the development of Section 9 At that meeting,they discussed whether the city should continue spot 39; development or if they should be looking at the entire section for coordinated developnnent. The 40 Economic Development Commission-would like direction from the EDA to proceed with requests for 41 proposals forthis section of Highway 10 and to develop a vision and,schematic plan:on what,could be 42 developed in that area. Ms Bennett proceeded to outline the process schedule:if the EDA authorizes the • 43 EDC to proceed as requested. 44' 45 Ms.Blanchard noted that severalplans have been Worked out Highway 10 projects in previous years., - 46 She wondered if it was feasible to complete another study at this time. 4' • •