My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-1997 EDA
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
07-28-1997 EDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:15:55 AM
Creation date
6/15/2018 5:57:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/28/1997
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
7/28/1997
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
dollars per year. It is estimated that the current tenants in the Red Oak Apartments Would qualify <br /> under these income limits,therefore the existing apartments can currently be considered affordable. <br /> The rent proposed for the development range from$509-$650 per month with the exception of 10 <br /> • units (5 existing and 5 new) that would be set aside for families that are on public assistance. These <br /> 10 units are referred to as Hollman Units under the Hollman Consent.Decree which was the result of a <br /> class action lawsuit filed by tenants of Minneapolis Public Housing claiming discrimination by HUD, <br /> Minneapolis PubJ c Housing Authority and City of.Minneapolis. The Hollman Consent Decree states <br /> that 770 units of public housing in the North Side of Minneapolis will be demolished and replaced <br /> with new and rehabd public housing units in other locations throughout the metro. Currently, <br /> there are approxi l .8 units under constrt( n in Chaska,Minnetonka; Savage,Washington <br /> County,Minneapoliraitd Carver County and 172 units planned in,other suburban locations. The <br /> tenants for the Hallman Units go through both screening by the Minneapolis Public Housing Agency <br /> and the SLC property management. Based on unfavorable tenant profile,SLC can refuse to accept <br /> tenants. (Attachment B: I-lollman Consent Decree Information.Flyer) <br /> • <br /> In reviewing this proposal,several issues have come forward from Council,staff and residents. MSP <br /> Real tate has addressed many of these concerns in the attached letter and supporting documentation <br /> dated July 24, 1997. (Attachment C) In addition,there was a concern that the increase in the number <br /> of children created from the new development will put a strain on the Mounds View School District. <br /> MSP Real Estate met with the Superintendent of Mounds View School District,Jan Witthun. The <br /> Director of Technology, Information and Planning is confident that there is adequate space available at <br /> one of the elementary schools that serve Mounds View. <br /> Conclusions and Options: <br /> The attached resolution would make a conditional approval to sellthe land to MSP Real Estate for the <br /> development of Silver Lake Commons Project. If the project does not move forward,the land is still <br /> under the ownership and control of the EDA. In addition,the sale would legally be tied to a <br /> development agreement which would be an additional assurance that the land is tied to the proposed <br /> development. The EDA may act on the resolution upon closure of the public hearing or they may <br /> defer decision to another meeting when the tax increment request is presented. But,if approved,there <br /> are still several controls that would give the EDA the legal right not to sell the property as noted above. <br /> If approved,the proceeds from the sale of the land is not subject.to the same requirements under State <br /> law for use of Tax Increment Funds. Even though the land was purchased with TIF,the proceeds <br /> would not be considered TIF and not subject to the TIF restrictions. Therefore,the$47,000,or what <br /> ever price is ultimately negotiated,can be used for other City projects that are non TIF eligible: As an <br /> example, two years ago the City discussed setting up first time home buyer program that would buy <br /> down interest rates or provide funds for closing costs. These type of programs can not be funded with <br /> the use of TIF because they are not clearly redevelopment but the land proceeds could be used. <br /> Staff if not prepared to present the final Tax Increment Financing Loan agreement at this time. The <br /> request if for a$230,000, 1%interest deferred 30-year loan due upon sale. This request represents <br /> 5%of the total project cost. The EDC recommended a conditional commitment to approve the loan <br /> with assurances that if there were additional funds from the relocation budget after 24 months,the <br /> EDA would receive those funds as partial payment of the loan. Staff is prepared to have a development • <br /> agreement drafted to bring to the EDA in August. <br /> Staff/Commission_Itecoprnmendat on: <br /> ® Staff is recommending the approval of Resolution No. 97-EDA72 for several reasons. The resolution is <br /> a conditional approval for the sale to MSP Real Estate and states that the sale would be in furtherance <br /> of the TIF Plan and for the public purposes noted in the TIF Plan to eliminate the blighting influences <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.