Laserfiche WebLink
UNAPPROVED <br /> 1 PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW <br /> 2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Meeting No.36 <br /> 5 June 9; 1997 <br /> 6 Mounds View.City Hall <br /> 7 2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View MN 55112 <br /> 8 *********************************************************************************** <br /> 9 <br /> 10 CALL TO QRDER, <br /> 11 <br /> 12 The Economic Development Authority was called to order by President McCarty on June 9, 1997 at 8:41 p.m. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 IWILL,CALL <br /> 15 <br /> 16 MEMBERS PRESENT: Duane McCarty,Julie Trude,Gly Quick,Roger Stigney,Roger Koopmeiners, <br /> 17 Director of Economic Development Cathy.Bennett,Clerk Administrator Chuck Whiting,and City Attorney <br /> 18 Bob Long <br /> 19 <br /> 20 . OTHERS PRESENT: None <br /> 21 <br /> 22 'APPROVAL OFAQ NDA: <br /> 23 <br /> 24 MOTION/SECOND:. Trude/Quick to Approve the Agenda,as presented. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 VOTE: 5 ayes. 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> 27 4 28 APPROVAL OF [1NUTESs <br /> 29 <br /> 30 MOTION/SECOND: TrudeiStigney to approve the minutes of the EDA Meeting on May 12, 1997 as <br /> 3.1 presented. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 VOTE: S ayes ` 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> 34 <br /> 35 CONSENT AGENDA: <br /> 36 <br /> 37 There were no items on the Consent Agenda. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 PUBLIC HEARINGS: <br /> 40 <br /> 41 There were no Public Hearings scheduled for this meeting. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 EDA DUSINE,$S: <br /> 44 <br /> 45 A. Consideration of Approving an Agreement with the Fire Department for the Controlled Burning of <br /> 46 the house at 8283 Long Lake Road. <br /> 47. <br /> 48 Ms.Bennett explained'that the city is required to obtain asbestos samples of the home prior to demolition. <br /> 49 There was the presence of asbestos in the;floor tile of the home and although it is under the limit for removal <br /> 50 prior to demolition,it is over the limit for burning and would require removal. The cost to have the asbestos <br /> 51 removed would be such that Ms.Bennett feels the Council should not consider the controlled burning of the <br /> 52 w�property and just move forward with demolition. 40 <br /> 53 <br />