My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-14-1997 EDA
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
04-14-1997 EDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:15:13 AM
Creation date
6/15/2018 6:13:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/14/1997
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
4/14/1997
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> April 10, 1997 <br /> 411 Page 2 <br /> minimize the impact on the mature oak trees which make this property so visually appealing. <br /> Section 3.2(b)(ii)states that the developer will provide satisfactory written substantiation of the <br /> amount and nature of the Development Costs for which reimbursement is sought. Section 3.2 (d) <br /> states that only Available Tax Increment shall be used to pay the amounts otherwise due on the <br /> EDA Note. Therefore, if the increment projected is not collected,the EDA is not obligated to <br /> pay the developer more than 60%of what is available for the six increment years. <br /> Lease to Zep Manufacturing: <br /> Section 2.2 (h) stipulates that throughout the term of the agreement Zep Manufacturing will <br /> occupy and lease facility. If Zep no longer leases the building,the EDA has the right to cancel <br /> this agreement and stop paying tax increment to the project. <br /> State Job and Wage Requirements: <br /> Section 2.2(I) outlines that this project will create at least 2 new jobs in Minnesota over a 2 year <br /> period with an hourly wage of at least$7. <br /> • "But For"Clause: <br /> The"but for" statement is covered under Section 2.2(f)and says that the developer represents <br /> that it would not be able to undertake, complete and provide for the operation of the <br /> improvements in the reasonable foreseeable future without the assistance. <br /> Signage Easement to the City: <br /> Section 3.4 covers the obligation of the developer to provide the City with a Perpetual Easement <br /> for the erection and maintenance of a sign indicating the limits of the City and location of the <br /> golf course. <br /> Cash Flow and Present Value Analysis: <br /> I have included a copy of the cash flow projections and present value analysis showing that over <br /> 6 years at 7%interest with an estimated market value of$1.1 million and administrative fees of <br /> 10%,the Net Present Value of increment generated would equal$253,769. Sixty percent of this <br /> would be approximately $152,261 of which Kenmark Partnership would receive a maximum of <br /> $150,000 as noted in the development assistance agreement. The cash flow projection keeps the <br /> tax rate constant anticipating that there will be increases and decreases over time. <br /> I have tried to provide you with sufficient information regarding the important aspects of the <br /> development agreement and legal obligations by both parties. If you have additional questions <br /> . please feel free to contact me prior to the meeting. This is a pretty straight forward agreement <br /> that is well within meeting the public purpose requirements under the State Statutes for providing <br /> tax increment financing and is recommended for approval by staff and tax increment consultant. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.