My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-27-1998 EDA
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
07-27-1998 EDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:15:54 AM
Creation date
6/15/2018 6:49:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/27/1998
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
7/27/1998
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioners also agreed to recommend William Laube as an alternate, in the event that <br /> either of the other two recommended candidates accepts an appointment to another City <br /> commission or is otherwise unable or unwilling to serve on the EDC. <br /> S <br /> 6. REPORTS FROM CHAIR, COMMISSIONERS,AND STAFF: <br /> EDC members and staff commented briefly on the prior discussion of the Mermaid project. <br /> Commissioners asked whether the Halls' "equity investment" of$1.1 million ($250,000 + <br /> $850,000) consisted of cash, or cash and land/building(s), or land and building ; one. It was <br /> also suggested that the projected 10%interest rate on the Banquet C a er fi ..ng may be <br /> significantly higher that the actual rate that could probabl be ob 50.., + at the stated 10 <br /> year amortization period may be significantly shorter e ti $} t is usually used <br /> for projects of this kind, thereby artificially inflating nual oper � ��w< es. With reg <br /> to the "Ameridnn Hotel Investment Analysis,"it w• :rested • = zd��� "'x "average <br /> daily rates"ranging from$62 to$70 for years 1 thr=,§€1 5 wer ': 'the lo Fed • <br /> ranging from$75 to$85 would probably be more u3 to ' 'ssioners c •"at it <br /> might be useful to get some advice or input on then related matters f b objective <br /> third party(consultant, analyst, etc.)who is more f <Y<< evenue projections, anticipated <br /> operating expenses and financing arrangements for . a •e. <br /> The Commissioners indicated that they apprecia the oppo ;; ; more about <br /> project, and that they are looking forward t. •tom,ma. .,,,'ore abou ect periodically, as it <br /> progresses. <br /> 7. ADJOURNMENT <br /> There being no further buss• .-fore R ommiss•, , this meeting of the Economic <br /> • <br /> Development Commission turned •roxim ,' 7:50 p.m. <br /> Resp:: „ >;- •mitted, <br /> Carroll <br /> • <br /> omic Development Coordinator <br /> • <br /> N:\DATA\GROUPS\ECONDEV\EDA-EDC\EDCIEDCMIN98\EDCMIN07.98 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.