My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1998/09/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
Agenda Packets - 1998/09/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:54 PM
Creation date
6/18/2018 5:25:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/8/1998
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/8/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
202.09 202.09 <br /> Subd. 3. Methods of Assessment: <br /> a. The nature of an improvement determines the method of assessment. The objective <br /> is to choose an assessment method which will arrive at a reasonable, fair and equitable <br /> assessment which will be uniform upon the same class of property within the assessed <br /> area. The most frequently recognized assessment methods are: the unit assessment, the <br /> front footage assessment and the area assessment. Depending upon the individual project, <br /> any one or a combination of these methods may be utilized to arrive at an appropriate cost <br /> distribution. City staff will consider all methods and weigh their applicability to the <br /> project and present a recommendation to the City Council in the form of a mock <br /> assessment roll (or rolls). A description of each assessment and its corresponding policy <br /> application is presented. A separate section (Section III) will identify the appropriate <br /> matchup of method with a specific type of project and analyze why each is generally <br /> used. <br /> The purpose of assessment formulas is to• allocate assessed costs among benefitted <br /> properties, the formula should result in an allocation of assessments which is reasonably <br /> related to the benefit received. Any one predetermined formula will not be appropriate <br /> in all cases because of circumstances unique to the relationship between the specific <br /> project and the specific properties benefitted. When considering an assessment method <br /> or formula for any given project, it may be necessary to combine assessment methods or <br /> ) to modify the methods described below. Therefore, the following description of methods <br /> of assessments should be regarded as guidelines, which may not be appropriate in all <br /> cases. <br /> b. Unit Assessment: A unit assessment shall be derived by dividing the total project cost <br /> by the number of Residential Equivalent Density (RED) units in the project area. A RED <br /> unit is defined as a single family residential unit. All platted and unplatted property will <br /> be assigned RED unit values equivalent to the underlying zoning. When the existing land <br /> use is less than the highest and best permitted use, the Council may consider the current <br /> use as well as the full potential of land use in determining the appropriate number of RED <br /> units. Otherwise, the following RED chart will apply on a per unit basis, subject to <br /> adjustment by the Council for any inequities: <br /> Single Family 1.00 RED <br /> Duplex 1.00 RED <br /> Condominium 0.80 RED <br /> Multifamily (3 units or more) 0.80 RED <br /> Townhouse 0.80 RED <br /> Commercial 2.00 Units <br /> Industrial 2.00 Units <br /> The unit approach has proven to be the best method in those instances whereby the <br /> improvement largely benefits everyone to the same degree and the cost of the <br /> improvement is not generally affected by parcel size. <br /> City of Mounds View <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.