My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1998/09/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
Agenda Packets - 1998/09/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:54 PM
Creation date
6/18/2018 5:25:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/8/1998
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/8/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L�. <br /> Item No. <br /> Meeting Date: 9-8-98 <br /> Staff Report No. <br /> Type of Business:WK <br /> WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; <br /> CA:Consent Agenda;EDAB:EDA Business <br /> Mounds View Economic Development Authority Staff <br /> Reort <br /> To: Honorable Mayor, City Council Members <br /> From: Steve Dorgan, Housing Inspector <br /> Item Title/Subject: Abatement of Hazardous Building- 2091 Hillview Road <br /> Date of Report: September 3, 1998 <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> In July of 1997, the City Council ordered the abatement of code violations for the building located at <br /> 2091 Hillview Road due to hazardous conditions. The property owner, Soji Agboola, subsequently <br /> released ownership of the property to Principal Residential Mortgage in September of 1997. In October <br /> of 1997, Principal Mortgage conveyed the property by"Special Warranty Deed" to the Department of <br /> Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In January of 1998, the City entered into an agreement with <br /> HUD which required all noncompliant code items on the property be brought into compliance by July 6, <br /> 1998 (attached). The agreement provided HUD the opportunity to sell the property and have all <br /> outstanding code violations on the property corrected. The agreement provides that if the required <br /> corrections were not made, HUD may specify"whether the abatement should be in the form of repairs <br /> or remediation to abate conditions or razing and removing the improvements on the property". HUD <br /> attempted to sell the property through auction on two separate occasions prior to July 6, 1998. Each <br /> time a bid on the property was approved, the buyer's mortgage company would not approve a loan <br /> because of the abatement order attached to the title. HUD has provided a letter to the City requesting <br /> the rehabilitation of the building be arranged (attached). <br /> Since the required completion date of July 6, 1998, staff has been approached by several developers <br /> regarding the purchase of the property for the purposes of redevelopment. Staff has been working with <br /> prospective developers exploring options to purchase and rehabilitate the property. A developer would <br /> not be able to purchase the property directly from HUD unless through an auction, however, the City <br /> may purchase the property from HUD at a 10% discount (apprx. $80,100) and in turn sell the property <br /> to a prospective developer for rehabilitation. The most prospective option for redevelopment of the <br /> building would be for the City to purchase the property at a discount from HUD and sell the property to <br /> a developer. To date, staff has yet to receive a substantial proposal for purchase and redevelopment of <br /> the property. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Throughout the abatement process the property owner, HUD and city staff have attempted most <br /> options available to effectively correct the outstanding code violations on the property. At this time, the <br /> city maintains the right to exercise HUD's request to arrange for the immediate abatement of the <br /> property through the correction of the violations pursuant to the agreement. According to HUD, <br /> rehabilitating the building would be the most cost effective redevelopment scenario for the property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.