Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Daniel L. Hall <br /> November 24, 1998 <br /> Page 2 <br /> (b) For the purpose of obtaining funds in an amount not exceeding the costs <br /> of the Development Property and the Minimum Improvements (including, <br /> but not limited to, labor and materials, equipment, professional fees, real <br /> estate taxes, construction interests, organization and other indirect costs of <br /> development, costs of constructing the Minimum Improvements, an <br /> allowance for contingencies, costs of any financing to fund construction or <br /> acquisition of the Project, amounts required to fund any reserves relating <br /> to construction or acquisition of the Project, amounts required fund any <br /> reserves relating to construction of the Project, and amounts required to <br /> fund any required escrow accounts); and, <br /> (c) Only upon the prior written approval of the City in accordance with <br /> Sections 8.1 and 8.2." <br /> I have incorporated the language of definition for First Mortgage in the proposed revision <br /> to Section 8.1 as above stated. The definitional section of the Development Agreement <br /> defines a "Mortgage" as any security agreement or mortgage which is a permitted <br /> encumbrance pursuant to the terms of Article 8. I think we need to include the revisions <br /> to Section 8.1 in order to make it absolutely clear that the existing mortgage may be <br /> deemed a permitted encumbrance, whether it remains in place or is refinanced as a part <br /> of the new project financing. <br /> 2 The definition of "Person" appearing on page 3 of the Development Agreement <br /> should include a Limited Liability Company. <br /> 3. As you know, the Project costs are usually quite a bit greater than the direct <br /> construction expense of the Minimum Improvements. This fact is recognized by the <br /> expansive recitation of those scft costs in Section 8.1. Accordingly, I think that Section <br /> 3.2 (d) should be revised to read as follows: • <br /> "(d) Receipt of the certification by the Developer, together with such supporting <br /> documentation as the City may reasonably require, evidencing and <br /> certifying that the Developer has expended not less than thirty percent <br /> (30%) of the cost of the Development Property and the Minimum <br /> Improvements (including, but not Iimited to, labor and materials, <br /> equipment, professional fees, real estate taxes, construction interests. <br /> organization and other indirect costs of development, and cost of <br /> constructing Minimum Improvements)." <br />